Originally posted by WM Wolverine
View Post
When your D plays like M's D seems to be capable of playing against a struggling offense (and you and I both know UF's O was struggling), game strategy certainly can and will change.
Let's say that when M goes to Happy Valley and plays PSU, there are multiple lead changes with both teams battling into the 4th quarter with both offenses managing to do damage; Speight is 12/24 with a TD and one INT. M has rushed for over 150. McSorley has thrown for 250 including one long TD bomb and Barkely is over 100. Both defenses are doing well with a slight edge to M on pressure metrics. M is up 4 by virtue of fumble recovery and FG as the third ends.
Does JH go higher risk and close the deal or does he go conservative to protect a 4pt lead allowing, IMO, the outcome to be decided by some weird high variance play, bad call by the refs or the football god's hating on M?
Comment