This is no trap game. It is a game in which M's defense will be challenged to contain a very good offense and M's offense will be challenged to either keep up, depending on how the defense plays, or play efficiently and mistake free offense, never giving IU's O a short field.
IU runs a spread offense a lot like osu's. The bread and butter run play is the inside zone. Constraints include an OZ, sweep. The OL is really effective at blocking these plays. There's no trickery. They're just good at what they do.
Sudafeld, is a very good passer, not Conner Cook good, but close. He can get the ball over the top on M's DB's not named Lewis. Very good PA and he also does a good imitation of the zone read option where he reads the DE who, if he crashes down, will keep it and run. He's good at it, very good. Again, nothing fancy. Just solid execution and technique. Here's a piece that does a good job of examining want M's D will see. I liked the part where the OP talked about eyes. What Jedd Fish talks about, playing with good eyes, now makes a lot of sense.
Durkin's theory in defending the read option or IZ, it seems, is getting interference into the backfield. I'm a little worried about injuries to Hurst and Glascow as their presence v. IU's offense is going to be key. Without them playing well, IU is going to score some points. In that case, it's going to be up to Rudock. After yesterday, I like his chances.
Really wish we didn't have to count on BT over-officiating in this game.
37 - 31 M
IU runs a spread offense a lot like osu's. The bread and butter run play is the inside zone. Constraints include an OZ, sweep. The OL is really effective at blocking these plays. There's no trickery. They're just good at what they do.
Sudafeld, is a very good passer, not Conner Cook good, but close. He can get the ball over the top on M's DB's not named Lewis. Very good PA and he also does a good imitation of the zone read option where he reads the DE who, if he crashes down, will keep it and run. He's good at it, very good. Again, nothing fancy. Just solid execution and technique. Here's a piece that does a good job of examining want M's D will see. I liked the part where the OP talked about eyes. What Jedd Fish talks about, playing with good eyes, now makes a lot of sense.
Durkin's theory in defending the read option or IZ, it seems, is getting interference into the backfield. I'm a little worried about injuries to Hurst and Glascow as their presence v. IU's offense is going to be key. Without them playing well, IU is going to score some points. In that case, it's going to be up to Rudock. After yesterday, I like his chances.
Really wish we didn't have to count on BT over-officiating in this game.
37 - 31 M
Comment