not watching.. I refuse to watch anything the SEC is in unless the BIG is playing them... or a few teams I like.. .such as OU.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
B1G/NCAA basketball
Collapse
X
-
talent... 82 was good... I was just thinking of a ten year run and couldn't leave out 93...
90's had some good ones, but nothing like the 80's early 90's in terms of every year being great games... not just the finals when I say thatGrammar... The difference between feeling your nuts and feeling you're nuts.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by iam416 View PostI'm not exactly sure when it started to decline.
Maybe the same applies to basketball, thinning out the talent. Except for those teams who can...ahem...concentrate it.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by hack View PostThis is silly. I'd like to eliminate the cheating and improve the reffing, but otherwise, bah. I mean, yes its frustrating that Kentucky can buy its way there, and I dont' like the dump-and-chase approach, but it's still going to be a fun game to watch no matter which schools.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wild Hoss View PostThis KY team is one of the most God-awful Finalist teams to watch play that I can recall. They score so many greasy buckets...its aggravating.
- Top
Comment
-
The expansion of tv has helped water things down, but I think that the mass early entries to the NBA is the biggest factor. In my opinion it has negatively affected both the pro and college game. It is a rarety that you have a lottery-level pick stay in college 3 or 4 years. 2 years is usually the max. Not to mention the numerous players who are good/great in college, but mistakenly think they are pro material, when they are not (e.g. Darius Morris). Think of today's NBA superstars - how many of them played college for 3 or 4 years? I'd bet it is about a handful. The other area this really shows up to me, and where the teams of the 80s up to the teams in the mid 90s blow today's teams away, is quality big men. Those players are hard to find, and almost always get tagged as a lottery pick, and just do not stick around.
JMO, but I think that the rise of the small schools/cinderellas is because they have guys who are in their system for 3-4 years, allowing them an experience factor that increasingly young with sheer talent cannot match.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by entropy View PostI've always preferred a system where 2 teams that just flirted with the top 25 play for it all
So you can make a case for a team like that earning a title shot IMO...but two?
- Top
Comment
Comment