If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having difficulty logging in, please REFRESH the page and clear your browser cache and try again.
If you still can't get logged in, please try using Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Firefox, Opera, or Safari to login. Also be sure you are using the latest version of your browser. Internet Explorer has not been updated in over seven years and will no longer work with the Forum software. Thanks
Or, they could just allow 6 fouls like the NBA. Then, if the player stays in the game, every foul they commit after that is two shots and the ball out of bounds. Fouled team keeps posession.
Every now and then Wiz posts something to prove he's not an idiot.
I think this would be a good rule.
I feel like I am watching the destruction of our democracy while my neighbors and friends cheer it on
I doubt they ever go to 6 fouls. The Big East had that experiment and it failed to catch on. I'm pretty sure they don't think it's an issue.
I always harp on the offensive fouls because they are outsized in importance compared to other levels of basketball. Today, Clark was the one everyone tuned into see and she got two offensive fouls. The first one was initiated by the defender by hooking her off arm. The second one looked like a total flop. They showed only one replay and you saw nothing from the angle they showed. The technical was ridiculous. 6 fouls would solve the issue but I doubt they ever go to it.
Part of the NBA's appeal is how they opened up the rules for more scoring and it took away a lot of the influence the refs have. In the 90s and early 2000s it devolved into caveman basketball where the refs had outsized influence.
UConn's won 5 of the last 25 titles. Good case they're the best program of the 21st century I suppose. Other than that first game against Duke it feels like all their title games were boring, however
What's strange is that they really sucked for several years until this season. Since their last title in 2014, they won a total of 1 NCAA tournament games, missed the tourney 5 times, lost in the first round each of the last two seasons. They remind me of the New Jersey Devils back when they were winning Cups. They'd win, miss the playoffs the next season, suck for a few years then out of nowhere win another Cup. Then miss the playoffs the next year...
I don’t understand how UConn does it. Bouncing back and forth between mediocrity to winning titles. The randomness of their last three title winning teams. They weren’t elite in the regular season. Caught fire in the NCAA tourney for whatever reason. Just seems like the odds of this happening is impossible.
Comment