Just read a tweet that "reported" that and may vacate 4 years of wins.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
All Things Notre Dame - The Clashmore Mike Memorial Thread
Collapse
X
-
Honestly, what's with this ND self-castigation, simply follow the SEC & Ohio Sate precedent......deny, counter accuse, stonewall, lawyer up, refuse to cooperate, overwhelm the NCAA and/or blame Michigan.
The fault actually lies with ESPN and spending 10 billion on college football over 5 years, that kind of cash injection has changed the game forever.
Enjoy your $16 Latte & Domino's* breadsticks during Michigan's season opener.
* You honestly thought DB came no strings attached?Last edited by Optimus Prime; August 16, 2014, 06:10 PM.?I don?t take vacations. I don?t get sick. I don?t observe major holidays. I?m a jackhammer.?
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Optimus Prime View Post...Enjoy your $16 Latte & Domino's* breadsticks during Michigan's season opener...
That would be breadstick (singular). Gads man, realign your priorities to revenue maximization!“Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx
- Top
Comment
-
Good ND preview on the mgoblog podcast from yesterday with an ND blogger. He thinks that the suspensions really hurt. ND has suffered a lot of attrition in recent years and they have some huge holes in the depth chart, especially at LB. Their starting WLB is a position switcher in his first year. The starting MIKE is a walk-on and the guy replacing Ishaq Williams will probably be a true freshman.
- Top
Comment
-
Yeah but you could post the same picture with Borges in there. It's just that Borges would take up more of the picture.
Srsly, the idea of Nussmeier seems a no-brainer. He has a track record of getting big noticeable improvements out of experienced by ineffective QBs. But the reports lately are that Gardner's mechanics are still a mess. And Mattison was once a no-brainer idea too. It starts at the top. If Nussmeier ends up like Mattison, less less effective than in the past, we know where to look.
Increasingly I wonder about the strength-and-conditioning aspect. If D Green is running at 220 this year, why the heck was he allowed to run at 240 last year? Is there an explanation for that that? Looks to me like one more area where Hoke's lack of attention to detail and unwillingness to explore every possible competitive advantage is hurting the program.
Then again, to be fair, nobody questions Beilein's approach to S&C, and the narrative on McGary is that he wasn't effective until the tournament b/c of dietary habits. I'm not sure I accept that. Something else may have been going on, and I always wondered about an injury hurting his lift and the back flaring up a few months later kinda fuels that suspicion. But, if true that diet played a role and Mitch was too tubby, that does acquit Hoke to a small extent re Green.
- Top
Comment
Comment