I still think it's odd you wouldn't let a talent like that at least come and take a look. And maybe make a contingent offer if there is such a thing. Verbals are what they are, verbals, and these are young talented kids you're dealing with. Kids who have a lot of options.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
UM Football Recruiting - by WM Wolverine
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by DennisT View PostI still think it's odd you wouldn't let a talent like that at least come and take a look. And maybe make a contingent offer if there is such a thing. Verbals are what they are, verbals, and these are young talented kids you're dealing with. Kids who have a lot of options.
- Top
Comment
-
A bird in the hand...
The old saying about a verbal contract being worth the paper it's written on? A silent verbal is worth even less in my mind.
The timing of the Schutt go away and the Pipkins leak is an unlikely coincidence imo. Wouldn't surprise me if staff told Pipkins he had to go public with his verbal in exchange for telling Schutt to go away.
- Top
Comment
-
I don't think it was anything like that.
I think the staff knew Pipkins (and probably O'Brien) want to come to Michigan after taking some visits, and agreed to keep things quiet. When by time Schutt made up his mind, his spot was gone.
If anything, Schutt needs to be upset with Notre Dame. Remember, they were his first choice."in order to lead America you must love America"
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by DennisT View PostA bird in the hand...
The old saying about a verbal contract being worth the paper it's written on? A silent verbal is worth even less in my mind.
The timing of the Schutt go away and the Pipkins leak is an unlikely coincidence imo. Wouldn't surprise me if staff told Pipkins he had to go public with his verbal in exchange for telling Schutt to go away.
I highly doubt Schutt would have been turned away if Pipkins wasn't a lock in the UM coaches minds. They had info that the rest of us did not have.
- Top
Comment
-
I don't see any reason to risk alienating a talented kid, his family, his coach, etc. If there were silents or locks or whatever, let the kid come have a look with the understanding that he's third in line. And communicate the same to 1 and 2.
- Top
Comment
-
That would be my line of thinking. Maybe there were some unspoken words though. Maybe it was a bit more diplomatic. Who knows. But, I agree that burning bridges down the road is something that we all would like not to happen--with any recruit.
- Top
Comment
Comment