Sure hope you're right about being wrong, Liney!
WM keep up the good work with those recruit rankings. Do you plan on taking down the 2012 list at some point? I think it might be a better idea to keep that list up there permanently; it'll be fun to look at it when those kids---most of whom won't even arrive on campus until this coming August---are juniors and seniors.
Looking at that 2012 list now and it's funny when I realize that:
1) I've gotten so involved in reading up on the next couple classes ('13 & '14) that I've somewhat forgotten some of the names on that 25-man list; and
2) seeing 11-3* ratings and being disappointed (when practically the entire '13 class will be 4* or better) is such a change from the previous few years when we settled for mostly 3* or even lower.
WM keep up the good work with those recruit rankings. Do you plan on taking down the 2012 list at some point? I think it might be a better idea to keep that list up there permanently; it'll be fun to look at it when those kids---most of whom won't even arrive on campus until this coming August---are juniors and seniors.
Looking at that 2012 list now and it's funny when I realize that:
1) I've gotten so involved in reading up on the next couple classes ('13 & '14) that I've somewhat forgotten some of the names on that 25-man list; and
2) seeing 11-3* ratings and being disappointed (when practically the entire '13 class will be 4* or better) is such a change from the previous few years when we settled for mostly 3* or even lower.
Comment