Announcement

Collapse

Please support the Forum by using the Amazon Link this Holiday Season

Amazon has started their Black Friday sales and there are some great deals to be had! As you shop this holiday season, please consider using the forum's Amazon.com link (listed in the menu as "Amazon Link") to add items to your cart and purchase them. The forum gets a small commission from every item sold.

Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.

If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!

Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.

Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah

Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
See more
See less

Around the Big Ten

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • No.. Bc. I hate apple
    Grammar... The difference between feeling your nuts and feeling you're nuts.

    Comment


    • FSU and BC on UConn

      Comment


      • Originally posted by entropy View Post
        No.. Bc. I hate apple
        BC views UConn as a threat to their limited New England market.

        Comment


        • Duke Coach Mike Krzyzewski is worried about the future of the Atlantic Coast Conference in the wake of Maryland's departure.

          "I think the ACC is vulnerable right now, I'm concerned about our conference," Krzyzewski said on Monday afternoon, taping a segment for his Basketball and Beyond show on Sirius XM Radio. The show will air on Wednesday night.

          When a guest asked Krzyzewski if he'd prefer Louisville or Connecticut to replace Maryland, which announced its departure for the Big Ten on Monday, Krzyzewski said before he could answer that he'd wanted to get everyone in a room and "close ranks and see who's still here."

          Krzyzewski added: "I think there could still be some movement in our conference."


          Read More: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...#ixzz2CiYtoh1e

          Comment


          • Thomas R. Noie (@tnoieNDInsider):

            Brey on future - "Is the ACC stable? Are we OK or what are we doing here? Interesting times"

            (Brey is ND's bball coach)

            Comment


            • As for Maryland as a road trip...well, I don't expect from the actual game atmosphere, but you can spend a long weekend in DC as part of the trip. You can take the Metro straight to campus. Stadium is a little more than a mile from the station.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post
                This board suggests that the BOT, the Presidents, the AD's, and Delaney are all horribly incompetent and simply aren't as informed about the numbers and situation as posters here.
                I'm sure that the executives at Coca-Cola felt very good about New Coke too. And Gene Smith was 100% sure that OSU wouldn't get a bowl ban. According to you, those decisions were self-validating because people with decision making power made them.

                But you're right. Worthless shit programs like Maryland and Rutgers that have never generated money for anyone else and who have AD revenues at the Purdue level will magically transform into financial powerhouses overnight, because areas of the country that don't care about college football will suddenly catch interest because Maryland plays Ohio State instead of Florida State.
                Last edited by Hannibal; November 19, 2012, 07:58 PM.

                Comment


                • Maryland's move was unanimously approved by every B1G10 school. That includes the Presidents, the AD's, the BOT's at Michigan, at Nebraska, at wherever.

                  Unanimous vote as in Stalinist USSR, Mao's China, and Goofy Guy North Korea? Dozens of opinions and nary a dissent? That doesn't pass the smell test. A sad, sad day for the conference.
                  “Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.” - Groucho Marx

                  Comment


                  • As usual, Frank The Tank makes some sense out of this mess:
                    From the moment that the Big Ten announced its intentions to expand three years ago, my attention immediately focused upon “What would be best for the Big Ten Network?” as what would be…


                    And this article from a few years back predicted this scenario:
                    The Big Ten appears to be stepping up the timetable for expansion dramatically, where what once looked like a 12-18 month process might now result in announcements prior to the end of June.  So, th…

                    Comment


                    • Everyone talks about how this is inevitable because college football is a business. Fine. What happens when the big donors start treating college football like a business? Has anyone ever noticed that businesses don't have "donors"? They have "investors". People who expect to get more money back out than they get in. Nobody gives $10 Million to their university because they expect to get $20 Million back out.

                      Comment


                      • So adding Maryland was all about TV sets and destabilizing the ACC...

                        pathetic
                        Shut the fuck up Donny!

                        Comment


                        • Maryland and Rutgers have never had the cash or the conference affiliation to succeed on the level of program like Iowa. There's really no reason they can't be built up to that. I don't expect it to happen overnight but if you had asked if Rutgers could ever have a routine bowl team in the late 90's, you would have said no. If you'd have asked if Boise State could be a national title contender in 2000 you would've been laughed at.

                          Even if the numbers are only a 1/3 of what they are predicting, every team will still come out ahead.

                          Since much of this seems to be in collusion with Fox or other networks then yes. I do have faith that they know what the fuck they are talking about. Certainly more faith than I have in nameless internet posters who, if they'd have had their way 20 years ago, would've told Penn State to go to hell

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by THE_WIZARD_ View Post
                            So adding Maryland was all about TV sets and destabilizing the ACC...

                            pathetic
                            Dr. Tom signed off on it.

                            You believe Dr. Tom is a clueless asshole, I take it?

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by drok View Post
                              As usual, Frank The Tank makes some sense out of this mess:
                              From the moment that the Big Ten announced its intentions to expand three years ago, my attention immediately focused upon “What would be best for the Big Ten Network?” as what would be…


                              And this article from a few years back predicted this scenario:
                              http://frankthetank.wordpress.com/20...g-ten-network/
                              The fact that so many people swallow these numbers without question is absolutely terrifying. He is saying that Rutgers and Maryland, by themselves are worth as much as the entire Big East conference, and that each of them are worth more than double an average Big Ten team. If you add Nebraska and Texas together, you get a number roughly equal to (or maybe even exceeding) what the Big 12 generated as a whole conference a couple of years ago. If you add the four of them together, you come up with a number only slightly less than the entire Big Ten distribution of $300MM. In other words, he is saying that a conference consisting of Texas, Nebraska, Rutgers, and Maryland is worth about 90% the current 12 team Big Ten. LMAO

                              Sanity check, anyone?
                              Last edited by Hannibal; November 19, 2012, 08:24 PM.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Hannibal View Post
                                Everyone talks about how this is inevitable because college football is a business. Fine. What happens when the big donors start treating college football like a business? Has anyone ever noticed that businesses don't have "donors"? They have "investors". People who expect to get more money back out than they get in. Nobody gives $10 Million to their university because they expect to get $20 Million back out.
                                Spot on. And I agree that just because private-sector CEOs go on acquisition sprees doesn't mean it's a good idea. It very often is not. That's said plenty by lotsa people; not an out-there kinda comment at all.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X