So, I don't see how it's a due process case unless the NCAA is a state actor.
I guess the due process claim maybe comes into a contract claim. If the NCAA is a contractually-created organization/organization where members sign up and if the Schools/Signatories agree to provide the NCAA revenue in some way (i.e., running March Madness) and if, in exchange for that revenue, the schools agreed the NCAA has a clearly-defined authority and set of procedures it implements and if the NCAA exceeded the scope of its authority or breached its own set of procedures, perhaps there's some claim in there. But, as everyone has noted, the BoT needs to get rid of the whole consent thing -- unless they can do that, any claim is dead.
I guess the due process claim maybe comes into a contract claim. If the NCAA is a contractually-created organization/organization where members sign up and if the Schools/Signatories agree to provide the NCAA revenue in some way (i.e., running March Madness) and if, in exchange for that revenue, the schools agreed the NCAA has a clearly-defined authority and set of procedures it implements and if the NCAA exceeded the scope of its authority or breached its own set of procedures, perhaps there's some claim in there. But, as everyone has noted, the BoT needs to get rid of the whole consent thing -- unless they can do that, any claim is dead.
Comment