If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having difficulty logging in, please REFRESH the page and clear your browser cache and try again.
If you still can't get logged in, please try using Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Firefox, Opera, or Safari to login. Also be sure you are using the latest version of your browser. Internet Explorer has not been updated in over seven years and will no longer work with the Forum software. Thanks
It's going to be a long night on offense unless the offensive line grew up since November. Defensively, I like how M matches up with KSU. Offense just can't give up short fields.
I'm a little disappointed at the lack of commitment from O'Brien. In his case he came into a situation with a program on life support and just when it stabilized some he's bailing out.
Benny Blades~"If you break down this team man for man, we have talent to compare with any team."
I'm just old fashioned. I think when you sign a contract it should mean something. I don't agree with buyout clauses to allow people to cut and run. Petrino in particular comes to mind. It's the old involved versus committed deal.
Benny Blades~"If you break down this team man for man, we have talent to compare with any team."
I think it should be both difficult and costly to break a contract and move on.
And I'd even add in "retiring" for a year or two, then signing on with another team. If you "retire", then sign with another team during the time that you were originally signed for, it should cost both parties some money.
And it's his job to turn it around! Not bail on the kids he recruited!
You're preaching to the choir with me, Tony. I agree completely. O'Brien talked a big game for 2 years, now he's bailing on those kids he recruited so he can have a bigger/better deal in the NFL. Its not right, nor is it fair to those kids.
I think it should be both difficult and costly to break a contract and move on.
And I'd even add in "retiring" for a year or two, then signing on with another team. If you "retire", then sign with another team during the time that you were originally signed for, it should cost both parties some money.
I agree and would add the NCAA or what ever org takes charge, should level sanction on the individual that stick with them. You screw up at your former post, then it comes to light when you are at the new gig, well you get some smack laid on you there. It should be about personal accountability
Benny Blades~"If you break down this team man for man, we have talent to compare with any team."
With the sanctions being lessened, PSU is headed for mediocrity for a few years instead of suckitude. [obviously] Their next head coach will have a good bit of influence on their trajectory.
Tweet
Comment