Or the CIC for that matter re the Stockholm Syndrome idea. I'm still open to the idea that it might matter, but some months back after I plumbed their website and found that their crowning accomplishment on it was $19m in savings for members over the course of a few decades, I'm pretty skeptical. Nobody had any way to make sense of that here, at least. Maybe I missed something, or maybe the CIC website does a terrible job explaining the organisation's impact and importance. Or maybe it's just there to obscure the fact that money and nothing else is driving this, and the conference doesn't really like to be seen as being all that craven.
Johns Hopkins as a lacrosse-only member of the Big Ten? Good grief.
Johns Hopkins as a lacrosse-only member of the Big Ten? Good grief.
Comment