Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Around the Big Ten

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Thanks for the post Whitley.

    Comment


    • Thanks guys... Good posts.

      KU would replace UNL as the most conservative school... I wonder how much that will hurt them?
      Grammar... The difference between feeling your nuts and feeling you're nuts.

      Comment


      • Is there a chance of Neb getting back into the AAU ... I really like that the B1G has had AAU members only.

        Comment


        • A quick follow-up -- the "source" guy was pushed on the Grant of Rights stuff (namely, his assertion that it's worthless). He said the B10 has looked at this and feels very strong about its position.
          Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]?
          Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.

          Comment


          • When Nebraska lost AAU status, it was thought Kansas was every bit at risk if not next on the list.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Pasadena Blue View Post
              Is there a chance of Neb getting back into the AAU ... I really like that the B1G has had AAU members only.
              I think when our next chance at membership rolls around in a few years we will have a good shot. It will be helpful if all the Big Ten schools vote for us in that instance...if they had last time we'd still be in it.

              Comment


              • What's the deal with the AAU, and how does it relate to college basketball?
                I don't always roll a joint, but when I do, its usually my ankle

                Comment


                • AAU is where all the top high school talents compete against each other in 3-on-3 style basketball (AAU also has other sports). The problem is these teams are organized, sponsored by people who have interests in CBB. Much like how a high school FB coach can have a huge impact in a FB players recruitment, an AAU coach can have as much or more impact on a BB recruitment than his actual HS coach...

                  This is one big reason why CFB coaches absolutely hate the 7-on-7 'events' propping up.

                  Comment


                  • Comment


                    • What liney is talking about:

                      The AAU was founded in 1888 to establish standards and uniformity in amateur sports. During its early years, the AAU served as a leader in international sport representing the U.S. in the international sports federations. The AAU worked closely with the Olympic movement to prepare athletes for the Olympic Games. After the Amateur Sports Act of 1978, the AAU has focused its efforts into providing sports programs for all participants of all ages beginning at the grass roots level. The philosophy of "Sports for All, Forever," is shared by nearly 800,000 participants and over 150,000 volunteers.

                      Comment


                      • Whitley, how precisely are research dollars shared? I mean, much of the time these are grants in which the money is tied. Budweiser funds a study that discovers that foreign beers give you gas, or Exxon funds a study that says waterfowl do well with a nice coating of oil on their feathers. Or a prof applies to a specific institution for x dollars to study topic y. When my wife's lab shares money, it is with a prof at UC Santa Cruz, because that prof is working on a similar project.

                        Comment


                        • B10 unsure what to do about divisions with the new additions, they even asked the fans about a week ago on their website & facebook...

                          I don't like pods but they solve one problem a great deal; that is that you play the 'other' division a lot more often. It works by rotating 'pods'; e.g. A plays C, B plays D in year 1 & 2... Year 3 & 4, A plays D, B plays C... You rotate who you play in the un-matching pod; e.g. B rotates who they play in D, A rotates who they play in C or you can have rivals in the un-matched pod.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by hack View Post
                            Whitley, how precisely are research dollars shared? I mean, much of the time these are grants in which the money is tied. Budweiser funds a study that discovers that foreign beers give you gas, or Exxon funds a study that says waterfowl do well with a nice coating of oil on their feathers. Or a prof applies to a specific institution for x dollars to study topic y. When my wife's lab shares money, it is with a prof at UC Santa Cruz, because that prof is working on a similar project.
                            Pretty much like you said....profs working on similar projects. Another reason that the academics have to get up to snuff. As I said, the research percentages I put up were only a guesstimate.
                            2012 Detroit Lions Draft: 1) Cordy Glenn G , 2) Brandon Taylor S, 3) Sean Spence olb, 4) Joe Adams WR/KR, 5) Matt McCants OT, 7a) B.J. Coleman QB 7b) Kewshan Martin WR

                            Comment


                            • Google search on CIC (probably official site) will likely yield a lot of good information about how it works. Whitley and I gave the very simple explanation, that being B10/CIC universities grouping together to land grants, where they'll share resources, professors, labs, etc.

                              Comment


                              • What I'm suggesting is that they don't do it based on a conference affiliation. Academics are in such specific niches that you couldn't even say ``well lets collaborate with someone preferably in the B10'' if you wanted to.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X