If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having difficulty logging in, please REFRESH the page and clear your browser cache and try again.
If you still can't get logged in, please try using Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Firefox, Opera, or Safari to login. Also be sure you are using the latest version of your browser. Internet Explorer has not been updated in over seven years and will no longer work with the Forum software. Thanks
Even if the numbers are only a 1/3 of what they are predicting, every team will still come out ahead.
Some e-mailer from Nigeria promised me five million dollars if I just send him a few thousand so that he can get out of the country. That five million number sounds inflated, but even if the real number ends up being one million dollars, I still come out ahead, right?
Osborne is on his way out...he knows also his vote makes zilch difference and frankly...it probably wasn't his vote...it was Perlman's dipshit...
I don't know why you'd even be upset. Practically nothing will change for you. It's Ohio State's schedule that will see the biggest changes. All you'll be doing is sitting back and collecting a much bigger paycheck than before.
And FWIW, I read about this for the first time Friday night on the Penn State Rivals board. The same guy who broke that story now says expect 16 teams by next summer.
It's obvious this is a stepping stone to 16. I fully expect the SEC to add two teams before the B1G does. You had to start somewhere...I was just hoping it was something better than Maryland & Rutgers. I'm looking at this from purely a football standpoint. Obviously the decision was based on more than that.
Depending on who those additions are, I'd almost rather have that if it increases the likelihood that we will return to geographic divisions so that some semblance of identity can be preserved. 16 isn't much worse than 14. At 14, the conference is already dead.
Last edited by Hannibal; November 19, 2012, 08:28 PM.
It's obvious this is a stepping stone to 16. I fully expect the SEC to add two teams before the B1G does. You had to start somewhere...I was just hoping it was something better than Maryland & Rutgers. I'm looking at this from purely a football standpoint. Obviously the decision was based on more than that.
If we go to 16, and it looks like we are, it's wholly unrealistic that it'd be something like Texas, Notre Dame, Florida, and Oklahoma.
Maryland is a bad team with ugly uniforms. But historically speaking they are at least as good as Purdue in both sports. And are a much better road trip, IMO. And if they open up only a 1/3 of the B'more & DC markets, they will be worth it. Good recruiting territory too.
I'm less sold on Rutgers but willing to give em a chance. They've made huge strides in the past decade. 10 years ago they were drawing under 20,000 a game in a decrepit stadium.
Depending on who those additions are, I'd almost rather have that if it increases the likelihood that we will return to geographic divisions so that some semblance of identity can be preserved. 16 isn't much worse than 14. At 14, the conference is already dead.
BTW, Delaney announced that the B1G will be opening an East Coast office. My guess is Nebraska was the last Midwestern member this conference will add.
Just mentioning this again. I thought it was a very interesting comment made by Delaney.
Before Kansas politics went nutty, I could have seen them as a possibility as Team #15 or #16. However, one has to question how much biological research (especially with stem cells) that the legislature is going allow them to do.
Assuming no Notre Dame....Virginia and North Carolina would be solid additions.
2012 Detroit Lions Draft: 1) Cordy Glenn G , 2) Brandon Taylor S, 3) Sean Spence olb, 4) Joe Adams WR/KR, 5) Matt McCants OT, 7a) B.J. Coleman QB 7b) Kewshan Martin WR
Comment