Hanni ..... I think the turnover prone characterization of M's O is over stated. M had one horrendous game against ND and since then DR and the offense overall have done pretty well.
What's not happening is the defense getting the ball on opponent turnovers. MSU was a perfect example of things just not falling. Two forced fumbles neither of them getting picked back up by M. Those would have been huge in that game Becasue both of them were in MSU's end of the field.
M ranks 71st in turnovers gained ( tied with MSU) and 75th in turnovers lost ( up from a low of 104).
It's worth mentioning that some of this probably has to do with Borges and Hoke going all conservative and such ...... So, yeah, there is a benefit there I grudgingly admit.
What's not happening is the defense getting the ball on opponent turnovers. MSU was a perfect example of things just not falling. Two forced fumbles neither of them getting picked back up by M. Those would have been huge in that game Becasue both of them were in MSU's end of the field.
M ranks 71st in turnovers gained ( tied with MSU) and 75th in turnovers lost ( up from a low of 104).
It's worth mentioning that some of this probably has to do with Borges and Hoke going all conservative and such ...... So, yeah, there is a benefit there I grudgingly admit.
Comment