I read it, Rob. It is an article about Paterno's influence. It is based on a single email chain over whether player stuff should be public. In other words, an absolute zero. The only reason this article is even written is because of Paterno's influence in the Sandusky debacle. It has to pile on to that to be relevant. Anyone with a brain knows that. And so when someone talks about JoePa and his influence in any broad sense or even a bad sense, it had to be included - it is the foundation of the claim. This email chain is jackshit without it.
Now, maybe I'm also misreading OP, too. You M boys are, apparently, like trying to read fucking Joyce. And he's the one author I never did get. So, please keep explaining what folks "really" mean. Or, heh, more likely, what you wished they meant.
Now, maybe I'm also misreading OP, too. You M boys are, apparently, like trying to read fucking Joyce. And he's the one author I never did get. So, please keep explaining what folks "really" mean. Or, heh, more likely, what you wished they meant.
Comment