If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having difficulty logging in, please REFRESH the page and clear your browser cache and try again.
If you still can't get logged in, please try using Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Firefox, Opera, or Safari to login. Also be sure you are using the latest version of your browser. Internet Explorer has not been updated in over seven years and will no longer work with the Forum software. Thanks
Hack, if you continued to pay attention to Stan, he ripped me a new one on several occasions here because of thing's I've said. If I remember correctly, he was upset with me for asking him to "simmer down" during some discussion that I don't recall now. I don't know if that was the last time he was here or not.
All that aside ...
I am considering going with the "card" thing just to let people know where they stand in regards to the rules. Not sure what the levels would be .. (i.e.. 5 warnings.. one week suspension... 10 warnings 1 month, etc..) but I'll entertain suggestions on that. I'm also considering the suggestion to have our ohio contingent restrict their comments to the "ohio" thread, and delete anything they put in other threads. I don't want to punish our Nebraska contributors by restricting them to a single thread, because in my mind, they aren't the problem here. So, am I being unfair, or guilty of uneven treatment if I restrict the ohio contingent, but not the Nebraska folks?
You tell me.
I just want our Michigan people back, and I'm willing to consider ANYTHING that will bring them back.
"The stockings were hung by the chimney with care, .. I'd worn them for weeks, and they needed the air"
So, am I being unfair, or guilty of uneven treatment if I restrict the ohio contingent, but not the Nebraska folks?
You tell me.
That's one of the most fucked up suggestions I've ever heard. If all you want is a closed society U-M circle jerk then go ahead. How long before the people that left come up with another reason? If they wanted to be here, they would be here.
The people that left, left. They aren't coming back because you've decided to make Talent and I second-class citizens here. All you're doing is encouraging more people to leave.
The whole the OSU guys are posting outside their thread "problem" is being extremely exaggerated. Almost all the mud-slinging on this forum is already contained on that thread.
The people that left, left. They aren't coming back because you've decided to make Talent and I second-class citizens here. All you're doing is encouraging more people to leave.
The whole the OSU guys are posting outside their thread "problem" is being extremely exaggerated. Almost all the mud-slinging on this forum is already contained on that thread.
Well, you two are second class citizens. Yer from Northern Kentucky. Deal with it!
Oh, and I agree with the rest of your post but, hell, Liney hammered me the last time I agreed with you. Which is exactly what should happen to those who agree with Northern Kentuckians. Heh.
Mission to CFB's National Championship accomplished. But the shine on the NC Trophy is embarrassingly wearing off. It's M B-Ball ..... or hockey or volley ball or name your college sport favorite time ...... until next year.
Hack, if you continued to pay attention to Stan, he ripped me a new one on several occasions here because of thing's I've said. If I remember correctly, he was upset with me for asking him to "simmer down" during some discussion that I don't recall now. I don't know if that was the last time he was here or not.
Right -- so it's OK for Stan to do what it is not OK for OSU fans to do because he did it to both you and me. That seems sensible to you?
Warn people who are out of line, if it continues ban them for a period of time. You're the dictator here, you make the rules were just here to provide input.
And truly LMAO @ anyone defending Stan White's "internet persona". You couldn't even engage in standard smack with him because it immediately devolved to personal attacks with whatever he knew about you, in my case my job.
I'd never ban him, though, or edit him. I do have him on ignore.
Comment