The unlimited transfer thing cannot go. The NCAA cannot restrict transfers due to getting their ass kicked in court. It was an anti-trust violation where the outcome in court was less in doubt than an Alabama/Mercer football game. The settlement was finalized this year.
I'd agree about getting one free transfer with no sitting out and then have to sit out the next transfer but that can't be implemented without some sort of players union so the rules can be collectively bargained. That gets around the anti-trust issue. Even then I think that is a longshot, what is in it for the players to have a union?
The pro athletes don't have unlimited free agency because they have signed contracts with the team they play for and the pro leagues in the US all have collective bargaining agreements where it allows the leagues to set work rules. Anytime one of the strike/lockout situations gets a little too long, the union will start to file for decertification which would make unlimited free agency a possibility.
I'd agree about getting one free transfer with no sitting out and then have to sit out the next transfer but that can't be implemented without some sort of players union so the rules can be collectively bargained. That gets around the anti-trust issue. Even then I think that is a longshot, what is in it for the players to have a union?
The pro athletes don't have unlimited free agency because they have signed contracts with the team they play for and the pro leagues in the US all have collective bargaining agreements where it allows the leagues to set work rules. Anytime one of the strike/lockout situations gets a little too long, the union will start to file for decertification which would make unlimited free agency a possibility.
Comment