I hope Cincinnati doesn't get into the playoffs. When the current system was instituted, the mandate was for the four best teams to be chosen for the playoff. Cincinnati beat an overrated ND team yesterday. OSU will have beaten MSU, PSU, UoM, and probably Iowa in the second half of the season. UC will have beaten nobody. I just don't see how UC is able to prove they are worthy of a playoff spot.
But, a scenario where OSU is chosen over UC will give impetus to the expansion of the playoffs. We shouldn't be talking about an undefeated team with a weak schedule missing the playoffs. An eight-team playoff would lessen the chance of this happening. As always, is it better to have a good record or have a good team? So far, the Selection Committee has firmly indicated that having a good record is preferable to having a good team.
But, a scenario where OSU is chosen over UC will give impetus to the expansion of the playoffs. We shouldn't be talking about an undefeated team with a weak schedule missing the playoffs. An eight-team playoff would lessen the chance of this happening. As always, is it better to have a good record or have a good team? So far, the Selection Committee has firmly indicated that having a good record is preferable to having a good team.
Comment