If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having difficulty logging in, please REFRESH the page and clear your browser cache and try again.
If you still can't get logged in, please try using Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Firefox, Opera, or Safari to login. Also be sure you are using the latest version of your browser. Internet Explorer has not been updated in over seven years and will no longer work with the Forum software. Thanks
It will go to 8 with 5 champs + G5 + 2 SEC teams or it will blow up.
This is the 4th BCS/CFP title game with a team that didn’t win its own conference. The first 3 are the lowest rated title games. This one will join those 3.
Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]? Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
The NC has always been a farce. It has always been. Prior to the BCS it was based on polls. Fucking polls. You may say that the BCS gave us a true NC. It did not. It gave us matchups based on polls, politics and money. They claimed to crown a champion on the field, but that is not what happened. The winner of the NC was appointed buy taking the winner of a game between two teams that were said to be the best, but there was no way of know if that was true. Politics and money.
The playoff system is flawed for the same reason. They claim to have a winner on the field, a true champion, but again, getting into the playoff is based on politics and money as much as play on the field.
Make the entrants on the field actually earn it on the field by winning their conference.
Cut the bullshit and crown a true champion. Not some made for TV, my team is better than your team poser.
I feel like I am watching the destruction of our democracy while my neighbors and friends cheer it on
You crack me up. I want the best teams in a 4-team.
Conference champs and at-larges are fine once it expands. Not optimal, but tolerable. Bama will be successful, regardless.
Like I said, I wouldn't expect you to say anything different it's a beneficial setup for you. Alabama will never get screwed by that committee. You're the name brand, they will bend over backwards, once you beat Mighty Mercer you were in.
It's the non name brand teams that have to worry, the committee will always make up something to discredit those teams so they can get the name brand teams.
The NFL had an oustanding week 17, everyone knew what had to happen for a team to get in. Buffalo needed a bunch of things go their way to get in. If it was in the hands of that CFP committee they would have set aside the tiebreakers.
The NC has always been a farce. It has always been. Prior to the BCS it was based on polls. Fucking polls. You may say that the BCS gave us a true NC. It did not. It gave us matchups based on polls, politics and money. They claimed to crown a champion on the field, but that is not what happened. The winner of the NC was appointed buy taking the winner of a game between two teams that were said to be the best, but there was no way of know if that was true. Politics and money.
The playoff system is flawed for the same reason. They claim to have a winner on the field, a true champion, but again, getting into the playoff is based on politics and money as much as play on the field.
Make the entrants on the field actually earn it on the field by winning their conference.
Cut the bullshit and crown a true champion. Not some made for TV, my team is better than your team poser.
Exactly right, the Iron Bowl should have had some consequences, instead it was a glorified exhibition, it was better for them to lose there than in the SEC Championship.
The NC has always been a farce. It has always been. Prior to the BCS it was based on polls. Fucking polls. You may say that the BCS gave us a true NC. It did not. It gave us matchups based on polls, politics and money. They claimed to crown a champion on the field, but that is not what happened. The winner of the NC was appointed buy taking the winner of a game between two teams that were said to be the best, but there was no way of know if that was true. Politics and money.
The playoff system is flawed for the same reason. They claim to have a winner on the field, a true champion, but again, getting into the playoff is based on politics and money as much as play on the field.
Make the entrants on the field actually earn it on the field by winning their conference.
Cut the bullshit and crown a true champion. Not some made for TV, my team is better than your team poser.
There is no way to know if the best teams are picked, regardless.
But when we go to 8 teams, we will get all 5 P5 conference champs. We will absolutely leave most G5 conferences at home, though. Every year. And rightfully so.
"The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is sometimes hard to verify their authenticity." -Abraham Lincoln
They may not be the "best" teams, but they will have earned there spot in the playoff on the field, not by someone's subjective opinion that one team is better than another like it is now.
If the conferences want, they could forgo sending the conference champion and send the "most representative" as their conference representative (we've seen that one before, btw)
I feel like I am watching the destruction of our democracy while my neighbors and friends cheer it on
Exactly right, the Iron Bowl should have had some consequences, instead it was a glorified exhibition, it was better for them to lose there than in the SEC Championship.
No P5 team, conference champion or not, has fewer conference losses than Bama. The conference champion is often helped by artificial tie-breaker rules that were made and conference splits. The SEC-West and Big Ten East are examples of that of late. We aren't talking round-robins or any of that mess. It's artfical and contrived. Hell, the BigXII stumbled onto the right way to pick champions.
"The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is sometimes hard to verify their authenticity." -Abraham Lincoln
They may not be the "best" teams, but they will have earned there spot in the playoff on the field, not by someone's subjective opinion that one team is better than another like it is now.
If the conferences want, they could forgo sending the conference champion and send the "most representative" as their conference representative (we've seen that one before, btw)
I want the best teams. No P5 team, conference champion or not, has fewer conference losses than Bama. The conference champion is often helped by artificial tie-breaker rules that were made and conference splits. The SEC-West and Big Ten East are examples of that of late. We aren't talking round-robins or any of that mess. It's artfical and contrived. Hell, the BigXII stumbled onto the right way to pick champions.
"The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is sometimes hard to verify their authenticity." -Abraham Lincoln
Comment