Yes, if it's true. Otherwise moot point.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Rest of College Football
Collapse
X
-
Ok, I've heard a millions times today that after targeting/personal foul is called the PF can't be reviewed but the targeting can. Why the fuck did the targeting foul on Rudock vs BYU get reversed then? They kept the ball at the previous spot. I'm assuming it was just another fuck up by B1G refs, but want confirmation.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by froot loops View PostI've never heard that. If the targeting is in error then the penalty goes away has always been my understanding.
It happened in another game today too, I forget which.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Oracle View PostIn the Clemson game they took away the targeting and kept the penalty. The "guest" referee said that the targeting can be reviewed, but not the roughing. The whole rule is a disaster that's repeatedly called incorrectly and fucked up left and right.
It happened in another game today too, I forget which.
- Top
Comment
-
In tonight's game Rudock got targeted in the first quarter when he was going out of bounds. The defensive player lowered the top of his helmet and nailed Rudock in the face mask. I didn't think the play he got injured was targeting, though.
I believe the targeting and the unnecessary roughness are separate calls. You can pick up the flag on any reviewed play (notice the blocking-in-the-back in the Miami runback being changed). But you don't have to. The refs can assess the UR penalty without kicking the player out for targeting.
- Top
Comment
-
some good signs in Philly today
- Top
Comment
Comment