The post in the "Ban Bloodsports" thread is genius work. Your effort lacked the brilliant straight-man hook (i.e., Bloodsports) and generally straight-man response defending Bloodsport. The confused "I think we're talking about two different things" response was the just reward.
Your effort is simply satire by exaggeration. A credible effort for an approach that rates as overused and poorly done by internet posters of every ilk.
A comparable effort on your part would have been along the lines of arguing that it's ridiculous to think that ESPN has any sort of bias for the Securities and Exchanges Commission, and so what if they do -- you'll be damned if anyone poor-mouths that outstanding organization.
In other words, to quoteth _THE_PROPHET_ ... STFU!
Your effort is simply satire by exaggeration. A credible effort for an approach that rates as overused and poorly done by internet posters of every ilk.
A comparable effort on your part would have been along the lines of arguing that it's ridiculous to think that ESPN has any sort of bias for the Securities and Exchanges Commission, and so what if they do -- you'll be damned if anyone poor-mouths that outstanding organization.
In other words, to quoteth _THE_PROPHET_ ... STFU!
Comment