I can't say I understand this decision, either. If the NCAA believes there isn't proof of the allegation, and that there isn't likely to be any(which I suspect is the case, since the autograph dealers in question have apparently solved Manziel's problem by refusing to cooperate with the NCAA), then the enforcement folks have no grounds to punish Manziel. There should be no suspension here whatsoever.
If, on the other hand, the NCAA believes it could potentially find proof in the next couple of months, it shouldn't be making any sort of deal with Texas A&M now. Rather, it should leave A&M and Manziel twisting in the wind, and let A&M's powers-that-be decide how much they want to risk on Johnny Manziel's credibility. This is just an exercise in NCAA judicial face-saving, and a pointless one, at that.
The other thing I don't understand about this whole ridiculous mess-- Johnny Manziel couldn't possibly have needed the money. His family is already rich(and has been for a good long while), and he's likely to be rich himself after this season. Whatever he made from those signings he could have gotten by asking his father for a check. Why risk your season to sign autographs for money you don't even need?
If, on the other hand, the NCAA believes it could potentially find proof in the next couple of months, it shouldn't be making any sort of deal with Texas A&M now. Rather, it should leave A&M and Manziel twisting in the wind, and let A&M's powers-that-be decide how much they want to risk on Johnny Manziel's credibility. This is just an exercise in NCAA judicial face-saving, and a pointless one, at that.
The other thing I don't understand about this whole ridiculous mess-- Johnny Manziel couldn't possibly have needed the money. His family is already rich(and has been for a good long while), and he's likely to be rich himself after this season. Whatever he made from those signings he could have gotten by asking his father for a check. Why risk your season to sign autographs for money you don't even need?
Comment