Say what you want about the MAC, I'll give them one thing: they are willing to put a College Football game on my TV screen every chance they get. No it isn't up to par with the big boys but most of the time it's entertaining. I mean thanks to the MAC I am no longer forced to watch football between Thursday and Monday Night only, I get 5 6 or sometimes 7 nights of football games per week. I think the MAC is actually doing it right as far as small conferences go. And if they dropped to FCS that might cost me 2 or 3 football games a week! I won't have it! LOL... well I see what you guys mean, I just watch a shit load of football even games that most others don't watch. My wife absolutely loves this......
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Rest of College Football
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by hack View PostIt's just another excuse for a failure
Or an explanation for the success of this year. No doubt in large part due to Mattison, who gets paid roughly triple RR's coordinators. You're not really denying that, are you?
Mattison wasn't going to coach under Rodriguez no matter what the salary was. The money being paid to Mattison now is to undo all the damage Rodriguez did.
- Top
Comment
-
"Mattison wasn't going to coach under Rodriguez no matter what the salary was. The money being paid to Mattison now is to undo all the damage Rodriguez did."
Mattison wasn't going to coach for anyone at the college level except Hoke. UM is able to pay Mattison the money he gets because they got Hoke at a discount. Brandon the idiot publicly said before he went on his "coach search" that he understood he would have to pay "market value" to secure a top coach for Michigan. He clearly was talking about Harbaugh or someone of his level. He got Hoke at a bargain. As a result he had money in the bank to hire Mattison. Mattison is a great coach but don't ever forget he's in it for himself. (Not that that's a bad thing) He left UM after 96 to go to ND because his daughter was going to ND and he would get free tuition for her if he was on staff. Can't blame him as he was probably making around 35 grand as an 'assistant coach" at UM in 96. Now he's making 900 grand and worth every penny. At least Brandon the buffoon recognizes when he needs to "change the formula" so he can stop putting a shit tasting product on the market.
- Top
Comment
-
When Michigan tallies RR's buyout at UWV (4M) Michigan paid half, plus the 2 million in legal fees that Michigan spend to defend RR & the program against the "exceeding practice time by 20 minutes" crap, plus 3 years of RR's salary, plus severance package when fired....
In addition to being the the worst coach in 132 years, he has proven to be the most expensive as well. Martin is a fiscal genius you say??I don?t take vacations. I don?t get sick. I don?t observe major holidays. I?m a jackhammer.?
- Top
Comment
-
Can someone refresh us on Craig James' uncalled for interference with the (?) Texas Tech coaching staff to get his son more playing time than was warranted? When I read that I concluded he must be a first class jerk trying to use his celebrity for unfair advantage. And that was certainly no favor to his son. I'm a little vague on the details.
- Top
Comment
-
If the people of the state of Texas actually elect Craig James to the U.S. Senate, the United States should sell Texas back to Mexico. Whatever price the United States would get would be a double windfall-- we'd be that much richer, and we'd be rid of Craig James' malign influence on our government.
- Top
Comment
-
If the people of the state of Texas actually elect Craig James to the U.S. Senate,"in order to lead America you must love America"
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by JRB View PostIf the people of the state of Texas actually elect Craig James to the U.S. Senate, the United States should sell Texas back to Mexico. Whatever price the United States would get would be a double windfall-- we'd be that much richer, and we'd be rid of Craig James' malign influence on our government.
I mean, in Texas, saying that you want to shoot anyone who disagrees with you gives you a bump in the polls.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jeff Buchanan View PostSchools that have had profitable football programs should no longer have to fund failing programs.
This decade will been seen, IMO, as a decade of fat-trimming as the old geographical alignments dissolve in the face of the dollar. Like it or not, it is what it is.
The long-term question, IMO, is what happens when the "Haves" finish the culling process and we wind up with NFL Lite. You slap together the top 70 or so programs and install a playoff, these 14-0 seasons are likely history. We'll regularly see 2-loss national champs, and even among that select group there will be "losers"; programs that rarely, if ever, get a sniff of the brass ring. Especially in an NCCA-free environment which likely be a near free-for-all when it comes to the influence of money on recruiting. The parameters will change, but as you raise the bar Michigan State can become what Weastern Michigan is today, just to use an example.
- Top
Comment
Comment