Announcement

Collapse

Please support the Forum by using the Amazon Link this Holiday Season

Amazon has started their Black Friday sales and there are some great deals to be had! As you shop this holiday season, please consider using the forum's Amazon.com link (listed in the menu as "Amazon Link") to add items to your cart and purchase them. The forum gets a small commission from every item sold.

Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.

If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!

Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.

Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah

Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
See more
See less

The Rest of College Football

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The unlimited transfer thing cannot go. The NCAA cannot restrict transfers due to getting their ass kicked in court. It was an anti-trust violation where the outcome in court was less in doubt than an Alabama/Mercer football game. The settlement was finalized ​​​​​​this year.

    I'd agree about getting one free transfer with no sitting out and then have to sit out the next transfer but that can't be implemented without some sort of players union so the rules can be collectively bargained. That gets around the anti-trust issue. Even then I think that is a longshot, what is in it for the players to have a union?

    The pro athletes don't have unlimited free agency because they have signed contracts with the team they play for and the pro leagues in the US all have collective bargaining agreements where it allows the leagues to set work rules. Anytime one of the strike/lockout situations gets a little too long, the union will start to file for decertification which would make unlimited free agency a possibility.



    This week, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and the NCAA reached a settlement regarding student-athlete transfer restrictions. The DOJ and NCAA hav

    Comment


    • The problem is the portal + the players getting paid for NIL by third parties that officially have no connection to the college. Neither of these things are going away and in the case of the NIL they cannot be restricted.



      Comment


      • Yeah, it’s the reality.
        Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]?
        Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Jeff Buchanan View Post
          The mechanics of a 16 team playoff and the time it takes to get all the games in, given academic schedules, aren't entirely smooth but, I agree, we're clearly headed toward 16 teams each in the BIG and SEC. For now, missing a decent organizing agency for a football playoff, the CFB Playoff Committee will do as that organizing agency. I don't particularly care what happens to the bystanders in the other conferences. The Presidents (including ND for now), or some other organizing agency, will independently have to get their heads together and figure out how they might want to proceed collectively
          I agree Jeff. And I propose the Las Vegas bookies as the "organizing agency". Vegas odds give the best test of which team(s) are best because money is on the line. There would be none of the selection committee's "well, SMU did have a nice comeback when the game was out of reach". Rank the teams 1-8 and let 1 play 8 in a normal quarterfinal round. Reseed after the first round. Then run it like the 4-team national championship.

          We are looking at PSU (a #6 seed) being favored by 10.5 over a #3 seed. Texas (#5) is favored by 14 over ASU (#4). This is nonsense.

          Comment


          • Winning a conference should have some weight even if it ends up with some weird mismatches based on Vegas lines.

            The organizing body is the NCAA. You may come up with a hypothetical organizing body that will produce a playoff to your liking,.but it's not based in reality. You may have some hypothetical scenario in which the Big Ten and SEC break away to for some super conference but I'm not sure it's based in reality and if the juice is worth the squeeze.

            The fact is there are 134 universities in the FCS and they have influence and votes. The also-ran programs provide a lot of opponents and their is no appetite from the football factories for eliminating the non-conference games. There is no appetite for doing away with the bowl system. What you have is what you always have in college football, they will trudge along with some system until they come up with a quarter measure 5 years from now to try to improve the situation. This will go on as long as you watch college football.

            ​​​​​​

            Comment


            • I could be convinced that 5 conferences receive automatic berths, but no way am I allowing them 1st round byes and be seeded 3rd/4th after this CFP.
              Last edited by WM Wolverine; Yesterday, 08:16 AM.

              Comment


              • Correct.
                "The stockings were hung by the chimney with care, .. I'd worn them for weeks, and they needed the air"

                Comment


                • The format seems worse than it is this year because the sudden collapse of the PAC 12 and subsequent realignment occurred AFTER the 12 team format was announced. Almost overnight we went from 5 power conferences to two power conferences and 2 mid-majorish conferences. Under the old alignment, the arguments would have been which P5 champ gets "screwed" out of a bye.

                  Apply the 12 team format to last year:

                  (1) Big Ten Champ: Michigan 13-0
                  (2) PAC 12 Champ: Washington 13-0
                  (3) SEC Champ: Alabama 12-1
                  (4) Big 12 Champ: Texas 12-1

                  (5) ACC Champ: FSU 13-0
                  (6) At large: Georgia 12-1
                  (7) At large: Ohio State 11-1
                  (8) At large: Oregon 11-2

                  If the 5-8 seeds won their home games like this year, your quarterfinals would have been:

                  Michigan vs. Oregon in the Rose Bowl
                  Ohio State vs. Washington Sugar/Peach
                  Georgia vs. Alabama Sugar/Peach
                  FSU vs. Texas in the Fiesta

                  Those would have been bangers and what the 12 team playoff was supposed to provide. All they need to do is get rid of the auto-byes for the top 4 conference champs and I think it'll be fine.

                  Comment


                  • Even with all the belly-aching and caterwauling about the current format, whoever wins it will be the best team.

                    The beloved Detroit Lions could be the 5th seed with a 14-3 record. No bellyaching in the NFL.. the biggest issue with college football is the constant complaints, it is one of the reasons why the NFL is far better.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X