If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having difficulty logging in, please REFRESH the page and clear your browser cache and try again.
If you still can't get logged in, please try using Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Firefox, Opera, or Safari to login. Also be sure you are using the latest version of your browser. Internet Explorer has not been updated in over seven years and will no longer work with the Forum software. Thanks
From what talent his posted here regarding contracts, osu likely does not have a tenable claim to fire him for cause.
Weren't you the one just complaining this morning about media rushing to judgement? You should not do so yourself.
My complaint is that the media tends to rush to judgement not based on facts.
My claim regarding contracts is based on the legal aspects of contracts - facts if you like - that talent is well equipped to discuss. i.e., osu does not have a tenable claim to fire ufm for cause.
I think you agree with this and posted your agreement.
You can sit down now.
Mission to CFB's National Championship accomplished. But the shine on the NC Trophy is embarrassingly wearing off. It's M B-Ball ..... or hockey or volley ball or name your college sport favorite time ...... until next year.
There's no "we" about it. The angry mob in this case is an illusion. If OSU is gullible enough to fall for it, then that's on them.
I can't stress that point enough.
I agree. There's no angry mob. OSU may have its own reasons for letting him go that we don't know about. Or they're gullible. Or they want to break with the past. Or who knows what? But it's clear that others have done worse and survived.
My complaint is that the media tends to rush to judgement not based on facts.
My claim regarding contracts is based on the legal aspects of contracts - facts if you like - that talent is well equipped to discuss. i.e., osu does not have a tenable claim to fire ufm for cause.
I think you agree with this and posted your agreement.
You can sit down now.
Jeff you just make a conclusion talent wasn't willing to make. You've rushed to judgement in just the way you dislike.
At Bob Evans Restaurants, we believe strongly in the family first values upon which the company was founded. We are suspending the current partnership with Urban Meyer and removing all related content pending the results of the official Ohio State University investigation.
I agree. There's no angry mob. OSU may have its own reasons for letting him go that we don't know about. Or they're gullible. Or they want to break with the past. Or who knows what? But it's clear that others have done worse and survived.
Yes. In a wind storm, Brian Fucking Kelly ordered a kid to climb up a 45-foot scaffold. His punishment was signing a letter that said he would be more careful when he ordered kids to do something that resulted in their death.
"The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is sometimes hard to verify their authenticity." -Abraham Lincoln
Officially, he resigned. I've never really known if he was too embarrassed or was pushed out. It was horrible. He didn't lie to the NCAA. He didn't turned a blind eye to the sodomy of young boys or the beating/raping of a woman. This was years before the current climate where people lose their shit if a kid bites a pop tart into the shape of a pistol. Moeller had no history of misbehavior. I don't recall any player scandals on his watch either. He was and is a good guy.
I'll let you ban hate speech when you let me define hate speech.
I actually think you are right ..... I drew a conclusion based on a reading of the law involving contracts by talent. If things were to proceed, e.g., osu fires ufm > ufm goes to court claiming wrongful termination > will the court find in ufm's favor? True, we don't know but I think talent is offering a view, not insubstantial, that if ufm was terminated, he would sue and probably win - granted a conclusion not based on fact but rather supposition. But the reading of contract law in this matter, as talent sees it, seems to be on ufm's side.
That's a bit different than the impact of what McMurphy has been doing on consumers of news - at least those that keep lapping up his shit - and I think that is pretty clear.
I don't know. Does it matter?
Mission to CFB's National Championship accomplished. But the shine on the NC Trophy is embarrassingly wearing off. It's M B-Ball ..... or hockey or volley ball or name your college sport favorite time ...... until next year.
Comment