Originally posted by THE_WIZARD_
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Nebraska...not feeling Frosty anymore
Collapse
X
-
Look...I hate the rule...needs to be changed...but there have been many players...including husker players...booted because of the same hit...but no reversal...but now OSU is in danger of being outed for a playoff spot...big date at Happy Valley...and VOILA!!!
It's a joke. The B1G is a joke. The NCAA is a joke. CFB officiating is at its worst level in history as well...multi-billion industry and this is the leadership...
pstheticLast edited by THE_WIZARD_; October 29, 2024, 09:25 AM.Shut the fuck up Donny!
- Top
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Speaking of penalty calls, Wiz:
Saturday, a Bama DL was pursuing the Mizzou QB after the snap. The line judge threw a flag for a Mizzou false start but fumbled the whistle initially and was not able to blow the whistle until the QB was being tackled. The Mizzou QB (who was in a position to see the LJ throw a flag and wave his arms) slowed but did not stop running. The flag was behind the DLman and outside of his line of sight. The QB was hit in the lower back and went down. He was not hurt.
The correct call was:
A) No penalty. Offsetting. Replay the down.
B) Assess the false start; no late hit due to lack of a whistle.
C) Pick up the flag for false start and assess a 15-yard roughing the QB.
Seems kinda rare. What woulda been correct? SEC refs chose option C. Regardless, it was a signature SEC officiating event."The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is sometimes hard to verify their authenticity." -Abraham Lincoln
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by AlabamAlum View PostSpeaking of penalty calls, Wiz:
Saturday, a Bama DL was pursuing the Mizzou QB after the snap. The line judge threw a flag for a Mizzou false start but fumbled the whistle initially and was not able to blow the whistle until the QB was being tackled. The Mizzou QB (who was in a position to see the LJ throw a flag and wave his arms) slowed but did not stop running. The flag was behind the DLman and outside of his line of sight. The QB was hit in the lower back and went down. He was not hurt.
The correct call was:
A) No penalty. Offsetting. Replay the down.
B) Assess the false start; no late hit due to lack of a whistle.
C) Pick up the flag for false start and assess a 15-yard roughing the QB.
Seems kinda rare. What woulda been correct? SEC refs chose option C. Regardless, it was a signature SEC officiating event.Shut the fuck up Donny!
- Top
- Likes 2
Comment
-
To be fair, DeBoer complained and they went back and assessed the false start but upheld the roughing/late hit call. So, the net result was a 10-yard Mizzou gain and a 1st down.
"The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is sometimes hard to verify their authenticity." -Abraham Lincoln
- Top
Comment
-
Whether the Alabama player gets flagged for a late hit shouldn't have anything to do with the false start. If they thought the Bama player committed a PF, wouldn't you still assess the false start first and then the 15 yards against Alabama? So a net gain of 10 yards for Missouri?
- Top
Comment
Comment