That rug really tied the room together...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects
Collapse
X
-
Remember when progressive Democrats used to denounce big corporations as the source of all social ills?
Now, progressive Democrats sit in Congress and demand that political appointees pledge not to sue big corporations!
And why do those progressive Democrats demand that political appointees not sue big corpirations?
Answer: Because progressive Democrats accept lots of money from big corporations—progressive Democrats are shills and protectors of the very corporations they denounce and claim to regulate.
If you want to understand why a big, anticonstitutional regulatory-subsidy state is bad, explore the question: Why do big corporations give so much money to politicians and political campaigns?
The money those corporations spend on political influence could be invested in research and development of new products, expanding production capacity, hiring additional sales staff, better marketing, etc.
Why do big businesses choose to spend so much influencing elected politicians and unelected bureaucrats? What are corporations buying when they give political donations to the old crony Senators you see on TV? The answer explains much that is wrong with our progressive United States and the progressive administrative state we now have.Shut the fuck up Donny!
- Top
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by THE_WIZARD_ View PostRemember when progressive Democrats used to denounce big corporations as the source of all social ills?
Now, progressive Democrats sit in Congress and demand that political appointees pledge not to sue big corporations!
And why do those progressive Democrats demand that political appointees not sue big corpirations?
Answer: Because progressive Democrats accept lots of money from big corporations—progressive Democrats are shills and protectors of the very corporations they denounce and claim to regulate.
If you want to understand why a big, anticonstitutional regulatory-subsidy state is bad, explore the question: Why do big corporations give so much money to politicians and political campaigns?
The money those corporations spend on political influence could be invested in research and development of new products, expanding production capacity, hiring additional sales staff, better marketing, etc.
Why do big businesses choose to spend so much influencing elected politicians and unelected bureaucrats? What are corporations buying when they give political donations to the old crony Senators you see on TV? The answer explains much that is wrong with our progressive United States and the progressive administrative state we now have.
- Top
Comment
-
Credit where credit is due. Dana White goes off on UFC fighter Bryce Mitchell, who called Hitler a "good guy" who just wanted to purify his country of the "greedy Jews" and queers.
Bryce Mitchell: UFC president Dana White denounces fighter who made pro-Adolf Hitler comments | CNN
- Top
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View PostGot any more articles from rightwing hacks gushing over how great a guy RFK Jr. is?Shut the fuck up Donny!
- Top
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View PostGot any more articles from rightwing hacks gushing over how great a guy RFK Jr. is?
- Top
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Da Geezer View Post
Conservatives should vote against RFK. Yesterday at the hearing, he committed to hire the first Native American to be his top aid. I've listened to hours of his testimony and he is evasive about vaccines. He wants power too much. There has to be someone who will not be controlled by Big Pharma who can set the HHS right.I don't always roll a joint, but when I do, its usually my ankle
- Top
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I'm 100% against Gabbard. She's slimy as fuck, has no true ideology, beliefs, positions, or core values. She exists solely to navigate the halls of power in DC and cultivate a persona for the cameras.
As for RFK, I'm not a fan and hope he doesn't get confirmed but I don't view him as much of a threat. Tulsi as DNI could cause actual harm.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by THE_WIZARD_ View Post...yeah Tulsi seems to be an opportunistic...suprised Trump trusts her as much as he seems to...
- Top
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment