Originally posted by iam416
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects
Collapse
X
-
- Top
-
Well, I mean -- a lie to whom? If they lied under oath that's a problem. I get that. It's not one we penalize to much, but it's at least illegal. If we lie, you know, to the American public then it's generally fine unless you're trying to defraud consumers -- and political advocacy ain't ever, ever been that. I mean, The Chairman lied about canceling student debt being Constitutional. Politicians lie all the time.
I certainly don't mind criminalzing conduct if it's tied to something more than advocacy of nonsense. If you advocate nonsense and then, e.g.,, assault people to advance that nonsense that's a problem.
If, however, you advocate an absurd lie like, e.g., that Georgia is implementing Jim Crow -- BUT EVEN WORSE -- then that's merely advocating fucking nonsense.
And the sort of worrisome thing about criminalizing this shit is that DJT getting his hands on the DOJ again isn't some sort of remote possibiity. And here were are establishing that advocacy of nonsense is criminal -- well, man -- that boils down to what you think is criminal nonsense and what is ok nonsense and that's not a good place to be. It's actually a terrible place to be.Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]?
Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
- Top
Comment
-
I get what you're saying and it's not realistic to prosecute every single person who's ever lied in an affidavit, under oath, etc. But you probably SHOULD go after the really big whoppers. I think prosecutors have enough internal communication between these people that indicate many of them knew what they were attesting to was a lie and what they were doing was potentially criminal. They weren't duly-certified by their states but swore under oath that they were. If this was someone caught lying in an affidavit in some small-stakes civil case I wouldn't give a shit, yeah let it slide. But this was an orchestrated effort to overturn the results of a presidential election by deception. I'm not cool with letting incompetence be a get-out-of-jail-free card for these people.
If prosecutors go after the fake electors who included the hedge that they are simply "alternates", then I will criticize that.
- Top
Comment
-
I understand, DSL, and if there's perjurious shit, then it's fine to criminalize within reasonable bounds.
Like I said, the Ds aren't going to control this shit forever. And the worst case scenario has to be way too plausible for your tastes.Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]?
Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by iam416 View PostI missed it. Probably too focused on the massive dirty fucking cheat operation of HARBAUGH*****.
McCarthy basically went through a lot of info about how federal courts typically operate and why Trump's motion/appeal options aren't going to successfully postpone the trial until after the election.
- Top
Comment
-
They always said the damn, dirty liberals were coming to take our guns away. We should've listened.
8199Sckm7SL._AC_UL600_SR600,600_.jpg
- Top
Comment
Comment