The one thing he refused to do was to confirm that Israel has a right to exist,
International law does not guarantee that right so, there's some word smithing there. Menachem Begun argued that the existence of Israel assures it's right to exist. Most ME scholars believe that is a workable concept. That stance, therefore, has moved the argument by antagonistic Arabs and Fundamental Islamists that Israel is a criminal state, never properly designated a state and is therefor "illegitimate."
That's the current effort on the political front, led by the Mullahs in Iran, to "delegitimize" Israel. Israel's right to exist is fundamentally couched in legal arguments over the legitimacy of the Israeli government. The Palestinian Authority (PA), along with Egypt and Jordan recognize that Israel "legitimately" governs certain lands, excluding those lands occupied in 1967 and the lands of the West Bank and Gaza, these are the lands legitimately governed by the Palestinian Authority. With respect to governance in Gaza, Hamas split with the PA in 2007 over the PA's drift toward moderate Arab states and the west, recognition that Israel legitimately governs certain lands and rejection of strict Islamic fundamentalism. The PA, made up of moderate Islamists, governs the West Bank; Hamas governs Gaza and retains a political presence in the West Bank and Lebanon.
Netanyahu has declared Hamas will not govern Gaza. It boils down to that in the context of what I laid out above. Israel does not have to occupy Gaza and I personally hope it doesn't try. It has to decapitate the Hamas military and political leadership and hopefully Israel has a plan to re-establish and install the PA as the legitimate government in Gaza and go forward from there. Clearly, the ideology embraced by Hamas isn't going to disappear but there are plenty of Palestinians that want peace not Hamas' and Iran's war. Israel and it's allies can leverage that.
Comment