Originally posted by Da Geezer
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects
Collapse
X
-
To be exceptionally fucking clear -- the Supreme Court denial was strictly procedural. If this case were anything other than an abortion case, it would have been 9-0. The plaintiffs are seeking to prevent people from doing something that they are either (a) incapable of doing that thing; or (b) have stated they have zero intention of doing that thing. It is, in short, akin to a case against me seeking to enjoin me from riding a flying cadillac to Jupiter. It's beyond ridiculous.
Roberts even ackowledges as much -- which, I'm sure DSL read and understood -- he says that defendants “may be correct” that “existing doctrines preclude judicial intervention.” LOL -- "may".
The other 3 aren't at all concerned about standing in the fucking least when it comes to abortion. They are entirely OUTCOME driven.
Kudos to the 5 justices for actually following the obvious law despite the pressure to do otherwise. And, lest there be any doubt that this is entirely procedural (and correct):
In reaching this conclusion, we stress that we do not purport to resolve definitively any jurisdictional or substantive claim in the applicants’ lawsuit. In particular, this order is not based on any conclusion about the constitutionality of Texas’s law, and in no way limits other procedurally proper challenges to the Texas law, including in Texas state courts.Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]?
Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by iam416 View PostTo be exceptionally fucking clear -- the Supreme Court denial was strictly procedural. If this case were anything other than an abortion case, it would have been 9-0. The plaintiffs are seeking to prevent people from doing something that they are either (a) incapable of doing that thing; or (b) have stated they have zero intention of doing that thing. It is, in short, akin to a case against me seeking to enjoin me from riding a flying cadillac to Jupiter. It's beyond ridiculous.
Roberts even ackowledges as much -- which, I'm sure DSL read and understood -- he says that defendants “may be correct” that “existing doctrines preclude judicial intervention.” LOL -- "may".
The other 3 aren't at all concerned about standing in the fucking least when it comes to abortion. They are entirely OUTCOME driven.
Kudos to the 5 justices for actually following the obvious law despite the pressure to do otherwise. And, lest there be any doubt that this is entirely procedural (and correct):
But, it's abortion, so...rule of law goes out the window for The Left.
- Top
Comment
-
Hey, no matter what side of the aisle you are on - Left or Right - there is one common thread that all of you gentlemen share. You are all, and I mean ALL, mind-numbingly insufferable blow hards."The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is sometimes hard to verify their authenticity." -Abraham Lincoln
- Top
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by AlabamAlum View PostHey, no matter what side of the aisle you are on - Left or Right - there is one common thread that all of you gentlemen share. You are all, and I mean ALL, mind-numbingly insufferable blow hards.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post
Let's say California wants to pass an egregiously unconstitutional law. So long as they delegate out the enforcement of that law to private non-state actors, would it be impossible for the highest court in the land to enjoin the law? My reading of Roberts is that he doesn't think states can or should be able to evade responsibility this way.Last edited by Kapture1; September 2, 2021, 11:17 AM.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by AlabamAlum View PostHey, no matter what side of the aisle you are on - Left or Right - there is one common thread that all of you gentlemen share. You are all, and I mean ALL, mind-numbingly insufferable blow hards."in order to lead America you must love America"
- Top
Comment
-
Pretty engaging article about the last 5 planes out of Kabul from the perspective of some of the pilots and crew.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ts/5693911001/
- Top
Comment
Comment