Originally posted by Whitley
View Post
Originally posted by Whitley
View Post
That model seems to have garnered universal acceptance by state public health authorities both early on as a means to anticipate resource shortages (bed space, ICU space and ventilators) and currently as a means of predicting if states can handle a surge in hospitalizations during re-openings. That is the IHME modeling from the Institute of Health Metrics at the University Of Washington. Here's a snapshot of Georgia's situation that predicts out to May 6th. You be the judge:
GA Bed Use.JPG
I've also included the IMHE link to the entire page from which this snap shot came. Here you can get more information and interact with the charts and graphs.
Sure, GA could be in trouble but the sources I'm looking at and fucking common sense says they'll be fine. Perfectly fine? I doubt it. There will be bumps in the road ahead that skeptics, like you, along with others that fear reopening are going to pounce upon to deride what the state of GA is doing. What they are rightfully doing, IMO, is to try to prevent high levels of unemployment, attendant loss of income and long term economic damage that precipitates undesirable social consequences. Doing that, including working to avoid undesirable social consequences, IMO, is a moral and ethical imperative that is equal to, and in the final analysis, may be greater than preventing increasing deaths associated with re-openings. YMMV.
https://covid19.healthdata.org/unite...merica/georgia
Comment