Originally posted by crashcourse
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by crashcourse View PostLaw enforcement raided Stone's house, and CNN witnessed uniformed and armed law enforcement approach his house just after 6 a.m. ET in Fort Lauderdale
well nice to see our intelligence agencies keeping cnn in the loop prior to the operation
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kapture1 View Postthey were told about POTENTIAL future releases lol
So this is a crime now? Speculation is a crime? Fact finding and oppo research is a crime now?
And if Trump was in bed with Putin and or Wikileaks, why would he need to contact Stone to see what he knew about more releases??
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post
Much to your chagrin, perjury, obstruction, and witness tampering all remain crimes. Yes.
I bring my point up because, again, I can see it in your glee, that you think this connects Trump with Russia haha
- Top
Comment
-
CNN has been the outlet that has been doing the most stakeout coverage. I'm not sure of any other news organization doing that type of work to that extent. They literally have people sitting on site at the federal courthouse every day, when you hear about activity it is normally first reported by the people staking it out.
- Top
Comment
-
Yeah, no story here indicting the press on this one.
I'll have to admit, Crash's and Kapture's continued defense of Trump is trending towards weak sauce. I can get on board with some of Trump's policies but he's a shameless liar. Did he work with Putin directly or indirectly to further his own business interests before his election as President, during his campaign, after his election? My crystal ball says yes to all of these. Illegal or unconstitutional? - probably yes to the later if Congress chose to pursue it. Did his business relationship with the Russians impair his ability to act in the best interests of US National Security? I'd say yes but there's nothing illegal or unconstitutional about that but it is horrendously inappropriate and terrible optics.
The big question is whether or not he was directly involved with efforts by the Russians to influence the outcome of the Presidential election in his favor. There's no question that the Russians did this shit. Did Trump know about it and tacitly allow it to happen? I think he did but it is going to be very hard to prove it in a legal sense, impossible to prove he colluded with the Russians to insure he would win the Presidency. None of that however speaks to Congress's duty to impeach a president when it is appropriate to do so. The Mueller report either will provide a basis to do that or it won't. Time will tell. But I'm having a hard time listening to Trump's defenders.Last edited by Jeff Buchanan; January 25, 2019, 10:21 AM.Mission to CFB's National Championship accomplished. But the shine on the NC Trophy is embarrassingly wearing off. It's M B-Ball ..... or hockey or volley ball or name your college sport favorite time ...... until next year.
- Top
Comment
Comment