DSL has been programmed to reply in rote to any indication that persons, whatever their color or race, have different abilities and will have different outcomes in life. The prog mind is unable to tolerate this simple fact because the highest good (to a prog) is equality of outcome. Decades of schooling in the everybody-is-equal mantra has created a generation of nitwits who, in a recent poll, said they believe America has never been great.
What is never discussed, or, heck, is never mentioned, is that Caucasoid people test more than one standard deviation above Negroids in every IQ test that has ever been developed? Progs have tried for years to develop a test that "adjusts for social conditions", but the one standard deviation remains. Why is this? Why do Mongoloids test 1/2 a standard deviation higher than Caucasoids on IQ tests? These results have been remarkably consistent for decades despite the best efforts of progs to denigrate them.
And why is the NBA 85% black with blacks being its most recognizable stars? Is this some conspiracy wherein blacks control who comes into the league and hence there is a "disparate impact" to whites? Blacks make up 12% of the population in the US, but blacks are overwhelmingly represented in the NBA and NFL. Does discrimination explain the disparity? Or is it physical?
There are lots of examples of this. One need only trust their own eyes. It is not always a conspiracy of evil men that cause racial disparities. DSL, If you were going to build a basketball team, would you take a random 100 black 17-year-old males, or would you take a random 100 white 17-year-old males to begin with? You would pick the black kids because your probability of getting the better players is higher. Of course, there are societal influences, but you have a better chance of getting a 6'6" kid with the blacks. That's because a random black is more physically gifted in basketball than a random white of the same age. Why do we denounce anyone who points out similar disparities in today's society?
When I was in high school there was a great to-do about "working in groups". We were told that the economy of the future was to be marked by cooperation among workers. Some of this panned out, but the greatest disruptive technologies in my life were mostly accomplished by lone actors (or just a few actors) working outside of the normal places where "discoveries" are "supposed" to be made. Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and Steve Jobs had better ideas that created industries.
One fact always remains: There will always be disparities of outcome in human achievement because there is a disparity of talent. This is not a value judgment as to the "value" of any particular occupation. It is simply a fact. Progs are selling their group-think ideas to those who are less talented or who are lazy. That is why equality of outcome is so important to them, just as it was to Marx, Lenin, and Mao. It is why they hate a capitalist system that rewards work, talent, and luck. The single word "fair" explains why we have truckloads of laws and a vast governmental bureaucracy. But who can be against "fair"?
What is never discussed, or, heck, is never mentioned, is that Caucasoid people test more than one standard deviation above Negroids in every IQ test that has ever been developed? Progs have tried for years to develop a test that "adjusts for social conditions", but the one standard deviation remains. Why is this? Why do Mongoloids test 1/2 a standard deviation higher than Caucasoids on IQ tests? These results have been remarkably consistent for decades despite the best efforts of progs to denigrate them.
And why is the NBA 85% black with blacks being its most recognizable stars? Is this some conspiracy wherein blacks control who comes into the league and hence there is a "disparate impact" to whites? Blacks make up 12% of the population in the US, but blacks are overwhelmingly represented in the NBA and NFL. Does discrimination explain the disparity? Or is it physical?
There are lots of examples of this. One need only trust their own eyes. It is not always a conspiracy of evil men that cause racial disparities. DSL, If you were going to build a basketball team, would you take a random 100 black 17-year-old males, or would you take a random 100 white 17-year-old males to begin with? You would pick the black kids because your probability of getting the better players is higher. Of course, there are societal influences, but you have a better chance of getting a 6'6" kid with the blacks. That's because a random black is more physically gifted in basketball than a random white of the same age. Why do we denounce anyone who points out similar disparities in today's society?
When I was in high school there was a great to-do about "working in groups". We were told that the economy of the future was to be marked by cooperation among workers. Some of this panned out, but the greatest disruptive technologies in my life were mostly accomplished by lone actors (or just a few actors) working outside of the normal places where "discoveries" are "supposed" to be made. Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and Steve Jobs had better ideas that created industries.
One fact always remains: There will always be disparities of outcome in human achievement because there is a disparity of talent. This is not a value judgment as to the "value" of any particular occupation. It is simply a fact. Progs are selling their group-think ideas to those who are less talented or who are lazy. That is why equality of outcome is so important to them, just as it was to Marx, Lenin, and Mao. It is why they hate a capitalist system that rewards work, talent, and luck. The single word "fair" explains why we have truckloads of laws and a vast governmental bureaucracy. But who can be against "fair"?
Comment