Originally posted by Jeff Buchanan
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects
Collapse
X
-
- Top
-
Cook political report moves the OH-12 race from "Lean R" to "Toss-Up" (this is the Balderson v. O'Connor race from two months ago). Internally polling apparently shows it in a virtual tie.
Interesting point in the article is that Denison University students were still at home for the summer during the August special election. It's not a huge school but this was a contest decided by under 2,000 votes last time. Meanwhile Republicans hope to improve on turnout.
Ohio Democrat Danny O'Connor hasn't gone quietly into the night after losing an August 7 special election to Republican Troy Balderson by a razor-thin 1,680 votes. Instead, the Franklin County Recorder outraised the new incumbent $1.3 million to $357,000 in September. Balderson hasn't had much time to gain an incumbency advantage, and private polls show an extremely tight race for a full term.
- Top
Comment
-
WWJD?
According to Pat Robertson, he'd sell the Saudis $100B in guns and not be bothered by an occasional murder
Vox is a general interest news site for the 21st century. Its mission: to help everyone understand our complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. In text, video and audio, our reporters explain politics, policy, world affairs, technology, culture, science, the climate crisis, money, health and everything else that matters. Our goal is to ensure that everyone, regardless of income or status, can access accurate information that empowers them.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View PostWWJD?
According to Pat Robertson, he'd sell the Saudis $100B in guns and not be bothered by an occasional murder
https://www.vox.com/2018/10/17/17990...a-trump-crisis
It's absolutely what Jesus would do."The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is sometimes hard to verify their authenticity." -Abraham Lincoln
- Top
Comment
-
Yeah no matter what Saudi Arabia does we always end of justifying it with "well the Iranians are worse". To some extent, there's justification in saying that if we didn't draw the line at how MBS has run the war in Yemen, or his extortion/execution of most of the Saudi royal family, or his near-war with Qatar, or his probable sponsoring of ISIS, why draw the line at this one guy?
Of course, I've been saying the Saudis are trash and our alliance with them is a disgrace for a while now...but hey...
- Top
Comment
-
I don't think there's any reason at all to say that. Saudi is the one that aggressively exports its ideology. Aggressive radicalization across the Muslim world and in our countries too. There is probably a mosque near everyone on this forum for which the Saudis agreed to renovate or build on the condition that they pick the imam. Say what you will about Iran and how they attempt to use Lebanon, Syria or the Houthis as proxies -- at least they're not aggressively exporting the most hateful version of their code. I don't think there's any security concern greater than Saudi.
The Khashoggi thing isn't about one journalist. Nor is it this incident on its own the litmus test for whether we still live in a rules-based world created for and by Western civilization. But it's one of a series of incidents that, if gone unresponded to, will erode much of the last bit of soft power the US still has.Last edited by hack; October 17, 2018, 07:37 PM.
- Top
Comment
-
And now there's this. Midway in this article Bob Corker says that the administration abruptly cancelled his intelligence briefing and told him no one in Congress will be given any additional information by the administration until further notice. "I can only surmise that the intel is not painting a pretty picture as it relates to Saudi Arabia" says Corker.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.af9962bb0115
- Top
Comment
-
Saudi is the key to the region only because the ratio of population to oil is really bad. Way too many people have a claim on those riches and are willing to blow up foreigners in Western capital. Saudi knows it has no post-oil future, which is why the were desperate enough to hand it over to MbS in the first place. Beyond that, Egypt is the key to the region because there's another 100m underemployed/easily radicalized people.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by hack View PostI don't think there's any reason at all to say that. Saudi is the one that aggressively exports its ideology. Aggressive radicalization across the Muslim world and in our countries too. There is probably a mosque near everyone on this forum for which the Saudis agreed to renovate or build on the condition that they pick the imam. Say what you will about Iran and how they attempt to use Lebanon, Syria or the Houthis as proxies -- at least they're not aggressively exporting the most hateful version of their code. I don't think there's any security concern greater than Saudi.
The Khashoggi thing isn't about one journalist. Nor is it this incident on its own the litmus test for whether we still live in a rules-based world created for and by Western civilization. But it's one of a series of incidents that, if gone unresponded to, will erode much of the last bit of soft power the US still has.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View PostAnd now there's this. Midway in this article Bob Corker says that the administration abruptly cancelled his intelligence briefing and told him no one in Congress will be given any additional information by the administration until further notice. "I can only surmise that the intel is not painting a pretty picture as it relates to Saudi Arabia" says Corker.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.af9962bb0115
- Top
Comment
Comment