I don't believe Obama ordered the DOJ to fully ignore the law, just prioritize violations, and not pursue action against states that had legalized it. But I'd like to see the actual guidelines. Or do you view prioritization itself as a gross violation of the Constitution and abuse of executive power?
As I said, we're at impasse for the reasons I stated. You can keep trying to recast what Obama did -- "prosecutorial discretion" to "prioritization" to "?" -- he decided to intentionally not enforce the law. It may have been to perfectly good and sensible ends. But it is, without question, not "faithfully executing the laws" of the US.
In my first post I noted that (a) Congress ought never have had the power to legislate like this but we are where we are with our expansive interstate commerce jurisprudence; and (b) since they did legislate, then they ought to revisit the issue with sensible legislation -- or, even better, get rid of it all and leave drug laws to the States -- as they should be.
But those are two separate conversations FOR ME. I value the process. If you don't value the process then you're fine with the Executive not doing his proscribed job if you agree with that particular fuck you to Aritcle II, Clause 5.
Comment