[ame]https://youtu.be/StJS51d1Fzg[/ame]
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by iam416 View PostRight, but what I'm saying is I don't see a bill that gets 50, but not 51. I don't see where the loss of the vote matters. IMO, the bill is going to be unanimous R (or, since they have 1 vote to play with, they can let someone go off and vote no for political show) or it's not passing -- there will be 4 or 5 or 6 Rs that won't back it.
JMO. And I'd very much like to see tax reform pass.
- Top
Comment
-
that 14 year old got felt up by old roy then bought her yearbook to him in December and had him sign it.
I think its sleezy and morally wrong but I do seem to rember some states allowing 14 yearolds to get married at some point. certsinly jerry lee lewis got away with it oin the 60's. different times differnet standards I guess
- Top
Comment
-
Tax reform/cut. Has always been the biggest goal. They have a lot riding on that and a limited time in which to do it. They need that vote.
Might I point out that the CBO scores the elimination of the individual mandate as saving $ 338 Billion over ten years? This is just as nonsensical as scoring the tax cut as "costing" $ 1.5 Trillion over ten years. It is all static scoring which has proven wrong in every case over at least the last 40 years. Elimination of the individual mandate will not "save" $ 338 billion any more than the tax cut will "cost" $ 1.5 Trillion over 10 years.
But if eliminating the individual mandate makes things "balance" for the CBO, so much the better. The less money sent to Washington, the better for the productive sectors of society.
And, as a BTY, the individual mandate was the only portion of the ACA that was found to be a tax and thus legislatively constitutional. One could only hope that its elimination will bring down the whole edifice of Obamacare which as always been unconstitutional.
- Top
Comment
Comment