Announcement

Collapse

Please support the Forum by using the Amazon Link this Holiday Season

Amazon has started their Black Friday sales and there are some great deals to be had! As you shop this holiday season, please consider using the forum's Amazon.com link (listed in the menu as "Amazon Link") to add items to your cart and purchase them. The forum gets a small commission from every item sold.

Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.

If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!

Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.

Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah

Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
See more
See less

Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Kapture1 View Post
    I don't think that we should be the highest corporate tax in the modernized world either. It's hard to lower that and not seem like it's just a sympathy for the top 1%, when in fact it's those corporations and small businesses that pay the top rate that will be able to give their middle class employees a raise, and lift more people into the middle class by expanding and or hiring more workers.

    I've never got a job from a poor person.
    If the law allowed you to deduct based upon some sort of pay relative to peers (tough to enforce/track/etc.. I know..) I'd be in agreement. I'm not as positive as you are corporations would invest in R&D or employees with the new cash.

    and yes, I know.. I've often said I'm for reducing the complexities of taxes and reducing deductions, so.. I'm being inconsistent here. I got it.
    Grammar... The difference between feeling your nuts and feeling you're nuts.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Kapture1 View Post
      It would help if he could cancel the first deal. But he cant.
      That's an excuse, the deal hasn't changed since the election, he said he could get a better deal. Go get a better deal, don't list reasons why he can't. He's the alleged deal maker, get a better deal.

      Comment


      • Ent,

        I don't think that you can say raises would be given. I think you can say that it can make the difference between borderline businesses surviving or going belly-up. I also believe it encourages potential entrepreneurs to make the leap. And for publicly held companies, it will increase dividends. All good things, imo.
        "The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is sometimes hard to verify their authenticity." -Abraham Lincoln

        Comment


        • Originally posted by AlabamAlum View Post
          Ent,

          I don't think that you can say raises would be given. I think you can say that it can make the difference between borderline businesses surviving or going belly-up. I also believe it encourages potential entrepreneurs to make the leap. And for publicly held companies, it will increase dividends. All good things, imo.
          I would agree with the borderline business surviving. It's a good point.

          I'd also like to see small business inheritance restructured to keep that aspect of our economy alive instead of promoting the corporate model.
          Grammar... The difference between feeling your nuts and feeling you're nuts.

          Comment


          • You can lower the corporate tax rate all you want, it won't make a lick of difference in hiring practices if your burgeoning industries are not labor intensive. The trickle down theory has an inherent assumption that companies have plans to hire people but they are just hindered by the tax rate.

            Comment


            • At heart it's a debate over whether you want more money or just more in comparison to others. If you want to grow the pie and make more available for all, you invest in education and infrastructure. If you want to have more in proportion to the overall, you focus on cutting taxes and paying out dividends.

              For the people who are actually going to make the decision (hint: not us), it's a question of whether they believe their great-grandchildren will be building factories and hiring people, or not.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by froot loops View Post
                That's an excuse, the deal hasn't changed since the election, he said he could get a better deal. Go get a better deal, don't list reasons why he can't. He's the alleged deal maker, get a better deal.
                I'm perfectly willing to acknowledge that Trump overstated his position as a candidate.

                It is simply not as easy as tearing up the old deal and starting over. I think you would agree to that. If you wouldn't agree that it's not that easy, well, then you are no more intellectually honest as candidate Trump.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by froot loops View Post
                  You can lower the corporate tax rate all you want, it won't make a lick of difference in hiring practices if your burgeoning industries are not labor intensive. The trickle down theory has an inherent assumption that companies have plans to hire people but they are just hindered by the tax rate.

                  If you're goal is to increase jobs in the US.... I'd suggest a more effective approach would be deductions based upon x% of your corp's workforce (including subs) that work in the US.
                  Grammar... The difference between feeling your nuts and feeling you're nuts.

                  Comment


                  • The Iran deal was a much better deal than the alleged deal maker Trump could make.
                    Trump would never have made a deal with the Iran that guaranteed them a nuclear weapon or gave them $ 150 Billion to use on terrorism. He also would not have airlifted $ 1.7 Billion in foreign currency as a payoff to the Mullahs.

                    EDIT: I gotta start reading the whole thread before posting. Sorry.
                    Last edited by Da Geezer; October 25, 2017, 11:23 AM.

                    Comment


                    • He should get to work, get something done, he promised. As a MAGA pressure him to make a better deal. Using a second Chicago or a Doc Brown Delorean is not an option.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by froot loops View Post
                        He should get to work, get something done, he promised. As a MAGA pressure him to make a better deal. Using a second Chicago or a Doc Brown Delorean is not an option.
                        Originally posted by Kapture1 View Post
                        then you are no more intellectually honest than candidate Trump.
                        Sad!
                        Last edited by Kapture1; October 25, 2017, 11:27 AM.

                        Comment


                        • horrible
                          Shut the fuck up Donny!

                          Comment


                          • You don't have the basic facts straight, so you won't be able to do that. You know what actually might? The EU. Oddly enough. The interesting thing about the tax debate in the US is that, outside it, globally, we are in the midst of the biggest change to tax rules since the creation of the double-tax treaty in the 1920s. The tax debate in the US is almost entirely ignorant of quite a few of the actual, real factors shaping the policy options.
                            Which was is the change in tax structure going in the EU hack? Are they raising taxes and raising regulation? Any particular reason that a study came out today showing EU business optimism the highest in at least 20 years?

                            Comment


                            • 64% of Americans support the legalization of marijuana, including for the first time ever, a majority of Republicans

                              http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...zing-marijuana

                              MAGA and legalize weed.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Kapture1 View Post
                                Sad!
                                He's the deal maker, if you and Geezer are that worried about Iran getting a nuke and this deal guarantees a nuke, you got to get to work. Bluster has its place, but it doesn't get a deal done. The things you list as bad were part of the negotiations to get them to slow down. The presence of a deal doesn't guarantee they get a nuclear bomb at all, they have been on that path for a long time.

                                If they are worried about an American invasion, no deal will ever stop them. That's what MAD is all about.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X