At this point, there is no investigative body that wouldn't be politically captured.
I could certainly believe that, but in the end what is verifiable is that there is only one that broke with its own rules to announce an investigation it knew had a very strong likelihood of influencing an election. While others may be just as politicized, this is the only one that is formally so to this extent. Which goes back to SLF's point about integrity in the system.
I could certainly believe that, but in the end what is verifiable is that there is only one that broke with its own rules to announce an investigation it knew had a very strong likelihood of influencing an election. While others may be just as politicized, this is the only one that is formally so to this extent. Which goes back to SLF's point about integrity in the system.
Comment