Obama isn't polling much better against Trump than Hillary Clinton, I think Biden would have done better but I'm not sure of it. Even absent this latest foul Trump story, Clinton was starting to pull away and their is good reason to think the public polls might be off. When Obama won in 2012 he outperformed the polls by 3 percent, he had a great ground game. Clinton has a good ground game and Trump has nothing to speak of.
Announcement
Collapse
Please support the Forum by using the Amazon Link this Holiday Season
Amazon has started their Black Friday sales and there are some great deals to be had! As you shop this holiday season, please consider using the forum's Amazon.com link (listed in the menu as "Amazon Link") to add items to your cart and purchase them. The forum gets a small commission from every item sold.
Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.
If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!
Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.
Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah
Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.
If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!
Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.
Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah
Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
See more
See less
Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects
Collapse
X
-
I don't understand the part about "kicking out a leg of it's own stool", and there was no "shortage of solid investments" (iconic companies started or took off in the period 2002-2007)
What I mean is that capitalism relies on people without capital for two things: to do the work, and to buy the products. When it was always the same people doing both, it worked. When it became people in low-cost countries doing the work and people in high-cost countries doing the buying, that was the equivalent of kicking out the leg of the stool. (I think you're right that new and high-quality opportunities came in the tech sector, but that wasn't nearly enough to compensate.) And it simultaneously boosted the supply of capital at a time when the universe of solid-return investments was shrinking (because consumers of manufactured products had less to spend).
This is why I think it's important to filter all of this through the inequality prism. No matter how the pie is split, the world's richest people will still be the world's richest people and afford to do the things nobody else can. But if that happens in an environment in which everyone else has enough, then that's better. Even if you eliminate all ethical concerns, redistribution comes with the practical benefit that you won't have excess capital out there hunting for bubbles to inflate or masses of regular people to dupe and defraud until they need state assistance.
- Top
Comment
-
It is Hack's picture of reality that makes economists throw out the notion of Helicopter Cash. Redistribution as abhorant as that term sounds may be the only way to keep the pitchforks at bay. I think that's a ways off but it is nonetheless what is going to happen. There are plenty of reasonable ways to bring this about but I'd say the outlook for a reasonable and incremental process is grim.Mission to CFB's National Championship accomplished. But the shine on the NC Trophy is embarrassingly wearing off. It's M B-Ball ..... or hockey or volley ball or name your college sport favorite time ...... until next year.
- Top
Comment
-
I gotta say, I was a bit befuddled by Kasich staying in the campaign as long as he did. But, man, his long con plan looks like gold, now. Build name recognition. Purposefully shit on the impending disaster anyone with a head on their shoulders knew was coming. And never back away.
I haven't a clue if a moderate R can win the primary -- probably not -- but he's about as well-positioned as a moderate R can be to do so.Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]?
Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
- Top
Comment
-
Fox just reported that senior level Republicans are taking seriously the possibility of Trump dropping out of the race...the committee that awards the actual nomination has been put on "stand by".
Whether he actually quits is anybody's guess but knowing his character that seems like a long shot. And there's no procedure to force him out
- Top
Comment
Comment