Announcement

Collapse

Please support the Forum by using the Amazon Link this Holiday Season

Amazon has started their Black Friday sales and there are some great deals to be had! As you shop this holiday season, please consider using the forum's Amazon.com link (listed in the menu as "Amazon Link") to add items to your cart and purchase them. The forum gets a small commission from every item sold.

Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.

If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!

Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.

Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah

Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
See more
See less

Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by AlabamAlum View Post
    The lowest income utilize more services when covered than those in the middle class and above. Probably because of lifestyle and that they had put off treatments and never had preventative.
    This was the part that concerned me from the beginning...much of these costs were already being incurred, but primarily at the County/State level. I was never clear on how the theoretical savings would be recouped, when preventative care was expanded. Nor did I really expect that it would.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Hannibal View Post
      http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/A...rategypoe.html



      1. Point out flaw with capitalism
      2. Impose wildly unrealistic government mandate on capitialism to fix flaw
      3. Attribute new and even worse flaws created by government on capitalism.
      4. Repeat
      Exactly.
      "The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is sometimes hard to verify their authenticity." -Abraham Lincoln

      Comment


      • Correction on Ohio...they've actually added way more to Medicaid than anticipated/projected and are running out money.

        It's really a brilliant and savvy move by the people pushing this agenda.
        As Hannibal noted, it's not a new strategy. But woe be to anyone who points out the long con in 2008.

        Fortunately, I think the R House will fight the brave fight for a long time.
        Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]?
        Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Wild Hoss View Post
          This was the part that concerned me from the beginning...much of these costs were already being incurred, but primarily at the County/State level. I was never clear on how the theoretical savings would be recouped, when preventative care was expanded. Nor did I really expect that it would.

          Yeah, they use three times the services and pay one-eighth the premium.

          Eventually, a generation away, preventative WILL save money because it treats hypertension before a stroke or dialysis and diabetes before a foot is cut off and offers a colonoscopy before all the cancer spreads (etc, etc)...which are all very expensive remedies to what were easily treatable illnesses.
          "The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is sometimes hard to verify their authenticity." -Abraham Lincoln

          Comment


          • Originally posted by AlabamAlum View Post
            Yeah, they use three times the services and pay one-eighth the premium.

            Eventually, a generation away, preventative WILL save money because it treats hypertension before a stroke or dialysis and diabetes before a foot is cut off and offers a colonoscopy before all the cancer spreads (etc, etc)...which are all very expensive remedies to what were easily treatable illnesses.
            So what is the most reasonable path to get from here to there, in your view?

            Or do we not bother, go back to the old ways and just accept that cutting off feet is the way we do business? Maybe expand legailized euthanasia to deal with the undiagnosed colon cancer? (Except that Rs won't agree to that last one either)

            Comment


            • Hoss.. You should read up on this... It's what is happening now in the physician practices related to medicare. The payment model is changing.



              or

              Grammar... The difference between feeling your nuts and feeling you're nuts.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Wild Hoss View Post
                So what is the most reasonable path to get from here to there, in your view?

                Or do we not bother, go back to the old ways and just accept that cutting off feet is the way we do business? Maybe expand legailized euthanasia to deal with the undiagnosed colon cancer? (Except that Rs won't agree to that last one either)
                The answer was expanding the federal portion of medicaid to better cover the working poor. That ship has sailed. With the impending reign of the PAH on the close horizon, PPACA will be further entrenched with the transition to single-payer being slowly introduced until the frog is sitting happily in boiling water.
                "The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is sometimes hard to verify their authenticity." -Abraham Lincoln

                Comment


                • And if that comes true, those who can afford it will buy additional insurance to avoid the lines, receive things like Kidney transplants after 55 and see the doctors they want..

                  A new market but you'll end up with a class system for Healthcare
                  Grammar... The difference between feeling your nuts and feeling you're nuts.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Wild Hoss View Post
                    Isn't it their right to "extort" cash for their property, in a capitalistic system?

                    "Location, location, location" right?
                    Sure & BLM , they're a regular Chamber of Commerce.

                    LOL
                    "Whole milk, not the candy-ass 2-percent or skim milk."

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by entropy View Post
                      And if that comes true, those who can afford it will buy additional insurance to avoid the lines, receive things like Kidney transplants after 55 and see the doctors they want..

                      A new market but you'll end up with a class system for Healthcare
                      Like in the UK.
                      "The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is sometimes hard to verify their authenticity." -Abraham Lincoln

                      Comment


                      • Like the UK
                        Grammar... The difference between feeling your nuts and feeling you're nuts.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by AlabamAlum View Post
                          The answer was expanding the federal portion of medicaid to better cover the working poor. That ship has sailed. With the impending reign of the PAH on the close horizon, PPACA will be further entrenched with the transition to single-payer being slowly introduced until the frog is sitting happily in boiling water.
                          :shrugs:

                          This is more or less what my opinion was eight years ago, as a novice. All I ever really thought we needed was a new approach to preventative care, tied to controls on cost savings at local levels. No problem, right? LOL.

                          Oiy.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Prime2 View Post
                            Sure & BLM , they're a regular Chamber of Commerce.

                            LOL
                            Why do they need to be? Or anybody?

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by entropy View Post
                              And if that comes true, those who can afford it will buy additional insurance to avoid the lines, receive things like Kidney transplants after 55 and see the doctors they want..

                              A new market but you'll end up with a class system for Healthcare
                              That's what we had before...but instead of good plans, crappy plans, and the ER, we'd have good plans and crappy plans. Progress!

                              Oiy

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by AlabamAlum View Post
                                The answer was expanding the federal portion of medicaid to better cover the working poor.
                                The real answer is to fix the underlying problem that is Economics 101 -- that people who directly consume medical services don't pay for them. Insurance companies and taxpayers pay for them. There is no condition under which this can succeed, and no amount of micromanagement or think tanking can do anything but mitigate damage.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X