Announcement

Collapse

Please support the Forum by using the Amazon Link this Holiday Season

Amazon has started their Black Friday sales and there are some great deals to be had! As you shop this holiday season, please consider using the forum's Amazon.com link (listed in the menu as "Amazon Link") to add items to your cart and purchase them. The forum gets a small commission from every item sold.

Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.

If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!

Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.

Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah

Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
See more
See less

Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • We used to laugh when China would run with a fake Onion story as if it were real. Here is your daily reminder our incoming administration will be run by paranoid, nut-job conspiracy theorists. Michael Flynn Jr. Will not rule out that Hillary Clinton ran a pedophilia ring out of the Comet Pizzeria. He is continuing this vicious rumor even after a gunman showed up there because of this awful false news story.




    Make America Great Again
    Last edited by froot loops; December 5, 2016, 08:09 PM.

    Comment


    • House GOP leadership signals it would NOT support the sort of tariffs Trump is calling for

      Comment


      • LOL.

        However, there will be tangible results that will result in improved and modernized airports which will make them more economically booming, which they will be able to attract more traffic, more landings and takeoffs, which include fees, more cargo being moved back and forth through them. It's gonna be an interesting philosophical argument, the idea of conservatism and smaller government, less government.

        Comment


        • If any good comes at all from a Trump Presidency it'll be exposing Limbaugh as a craven, soulless hack, who'll quickly change his tune to retain his dying audience.

          Reagan, free market economics, and free trade all quickly abandoned because his callers no longer like them.

          Comment


          • LOL this is great. I can't believe this is what the next 4 years are going to be.

            [ame]https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/806134244384899072[/ame]

            [ame]https://twitter.com/sissenberg/status/806147576298774528[/ame]

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post
              If any good comes at all from a Trump Presidency it'll be exposing Limbaugh as a craven, soulless hack, who'll quickly change his tune to retain his dying audience.

              Reagan, free market economics, and free trade all quickly abandoned because his callers no longer like them.

              It will be more than just Limbaugh. Look at all of these GOP pols changing your tune to try and get a job. Good grief, Jon Huntsman is praising Trump for Taiwan to try and get a job. Craven for power.

              Daniel Larison will be an interesting read for the next 4 years.

              Comment


              • well.. that's politics Froot. A very frustrating part of politics. Both sides do it and are not immune to pandering for votes.

                anyone who thought Rush was anything but a Republican radio show was na?ve. He's not a conservative. He's a republican.
                Grammar... The difference between feeling your nuts and feeling you're nuts.

                Comment


                • and when Trump crashes and the country votes for a D next election, he'll proclaim the Republicans lost their conservative values and he was right all along.
                  Grammar... The difference between feeling your nuts and feeling you're nuts.

                  Comment


                  • Limbaugh has gone after enough Republicans in the past (i.e. McCain) that I thought he was more of an ideological purist. Guess not.

                    And yeah, he is straddling the line just barely enough to claim that he was right all along should The Donald slip in popularity.

                    Comment


                    • I'm not seeing the big hypocritical pivot by Limbaugh that you guys are seeing. Go read the transcript of the entire monologue.

                      Comment


                      • Trump sent out that tweeting blasting Boeing with bad information in it. Boeing's current contract is only worth $170 M.



                        And there's now speculation that Trump was simply upset over Boeing's CEO being critical of him in an article with the Chicago Tribune over his trade & China policies.

                        Criticize the Donald and he WILL use the power of the govt to harm your business

                        Comment


                        • It's gonna be a long four years. He's a petulant child and he has the nuclear football.
                          "The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is sometimes hard to verify their authenticity." -Abraham Lincoln

                          Comment




                          • article on new research regarding climate change
                            Grammar... The difference between feeling your nuts and feeling you're nuts.

                            Comment


                            • It's gonna be a long four years. He's a petulant child and he has the nuclear football.
                              It's like the Mike Price Reign in Tuscaloosa.
                              Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]?
                              Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.

                              Comment


                              • hack:
                                You claim regularly that government cannot increase GDP, so any claim that an uptick in outlook is due to any expectations of something from government is an inconsistency you'd have to explain.

                                Well, if you keep hitting yourself on the head with a hammer it might feel good when you stop. That doesn't make hitting yourself in the head good policy. The optimism we see now is in the stopping. Some of us view "not hitting yourself on the head with a hammer" as normative behavior rather than something government "does".

                                The expectation is not something "from" government. The expectation is that government ceases to be a drag on the economy because Trump has said he wants to eliminate the most harmful regulations and also decrease taxes. Regulations are really nothing but a pernicious and non-transparent tax and the average American family pays 29% of their household income toward regulation (see my post about a week ago).

                                I've never said that government can't positively affect GDP. Of course, it can. Tax cuts are an obvious example. But those governmental activities that accelerate GDP all result in less government. That is a big distinction.

                                What I have said is that the $ 100,000 salary paid to an EPA bureaucrat is counted toward GDP when, in fact, the "duty" of the bureaucrat often is to institute rules that substantially decrease production. I say that the 100k should not count toward GDP. BTW, this is in the context of negative interest rates.

                                Announced yesterday was that the Pentagon had "lost" $ 125 billion, and had covered up the report that came to that conclusion. We now have 1,000,000 DOD employees supporting 1,300,000 military personnel. I just don't believe we need that many civilian employees. If we were to cut the civilian staff to 500k, I wouldn't view that cut as something government "does".

                                BTW, what I believe has a name. It is called zero-based budgeting.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X