If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having difficulty logging in, please REFRESH the page and clear your browser cache and try again.
If you still can't get logged in, please try using Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Firefox, Opera, or Safari to login. Also be sure you are using the latest version of your browser. Internet Explorer has not been updated in over seven years and will no longer work with the Forum software. Thanks
IMO, Trumps entire appeal has been a populist one from a frustrated and essentially disenfranchised electorate - the same kind of thing that is going on in every country where there is an election, sham or free, and where tyrants, like Adolph Hitler or real leaders like Nelson Mandella have an opportunity to come to power.
If the Rs had been able to find a candidate other than the ass hole that surfaced almost by default, they would have rocked this election.
Instead, we have the Clintons as the best alternative. I can deal with that as an alternative to one of the most divisive, potentially tyrannical presidential candidates that I can recall in the history of US presidential elections.
Mission to CFB's National Championship accomplished. But the shine on the NC Trophy is embarrassingly wearing off. It's M B-Ball ..... or hockey or volley ball or name your college sport favorite time ...... until next year.
It was more about the crowing of the early voting margins, when they reduced the early polls that the African American population used in North Carolina. What was the reasoning behind that?
I'm saying they cut down early voting because the African American population utilized it. I'll let you and the Geezer tell us about how smart or stupid people are. It's pretty clear what these laws are designed for. In the case of North Carolina, there was a reason they waited for the flawed Shelby decision to enact all of those laws.
I think Sabato is fairly close, Geezer. But I don't see him going lower than 216. But, hey, Ohio could go for HRC and that would put him just below 200.
Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]? Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
Absent any causal effect on voter turnout, I don't care. So, tell me there's an effect, Froot. Or not. And if there is an effect, explain it to me in your despicable soft racism.
Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]? Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
I believe Trump's ceiling is 264. I do not think he will win Nevada based on the (what I believe is) credible info coming from Jon Ralston about early voting out there. If you give him Maine District 2 plus Ohio, Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, and Iowa, he's stuck at that number. And I still think Hillary should prob be favored in Florida. And still has a shot in NC.
Ohio, I fear, is Trumpland. And may head towards electoral irrelevance in the future like Missouri if worst comes to worst.
This election has shown though that if the Republican Party heads in the direction Trump has pointed them, there will be a significant realignment. There may soon come a day where the entire east coast (perhaps minus South Carolina) will vote Democrat.
For decades Sun Belt Republicans have boasted of their region's fast population growth. It will eventually come back to haunt them. It is Hispanics and relocated north-easterners that are mainly driving that growth. And neither is hardcore conservative.
Well, for you non-Michiganders, you might want to look up the Michigan Democrat primary of 1972. The winner was George Wallace. I think it was his only win outside the old Confederacy. He won with a lot of the same issues that Trump has now. Michigan can be a quirky state, as the Sanders win this year proved.
Comment