Originally posted by Da Geezer
View Post
You may have a wider point about the efficacy of the judiciary system, but that has nothing to do specifically with the Clintons and everything to do with the system they exploited. What's true for the Clintons is similar for others in their position. If Cheney and Rumsfeld hadn't seen what the Clintons got away with maybe they would not have been so bold in diverting the DOD budget into their own pockets. Especially without the independent prosecutor law, so they never had to have their own version of a Ken Starr out on a pemanent fishing expedition.
This is why corruption is so crippling. When one person gets away with it the next person's sense of what is possible expands. With the Clintons it was influence-peddling schemes and Bill's sexual crimes, and then suddenly White House-based corruption exploded into war profiteering by diverting taxpayer money to direct beneficiaries. That's a pretty fast escalation and we are awfully lucky we followed that up with 8 years of a president who doesn't seem interested in that.
I agree with you that heads must roll at every opportunity. I disagree with the disproportionate investigation of one set of candidates for that treatment and the wholesale ignorance/whitewashing of another's. That's bullshit.
Comment