The news today - almost across the board from liberal and conservative sources - is starkly negative in assessing Trump's chaotic trade policy. The most neutral assessments revolve around getting trading partners to talk about removing monetary and non-monetary trade barriers to US products and services shipped abroad. Also revealed is the divide among West Wing advisors in Trump's circle between tariff hardliners (Navarro) and moderates (Bessent). It looks like moderates have prevailed - for now.
Even those come with the caveat that the path forward is not at all clear given the 90d pause in most of Trump's tariffs. Thus, there's as much uncertainty about the impact of tariffs at the rates Trump is talking about going forward as there was before the pause. Chaos within the WH is, apparently, still present.
The administration's shifting depiction of it's trade and tariff policies may be consistent with Trump's overall behavior and characterized as some kind of a "grand strategy" (his people have said that this morning). The downside is that when he says something about trade policy himself or his spokes people do, his history of twisting the facts to his view or flat-out lying have become so regular that anything that is said about US trade policy isn't believable...... and let me be clear: I'm not a "Trumper" or an apologist for his trade policy behavior. I did not vote for him. What I post here that may sound like support for DJT and his trade policy is simply a reflection of my willingness to entertain the arguments for and against both sides of said trade policy. I'm a neutral observer with a lean toward favoring a lot of things Trump has done since his inauguration - the way his trade policy regarding tariffs was implemented is not among those.
Even though I'm glad trump's pause, or retreat if that's what you want to call it, caused the markets to sharply reverse course, futures this morning indicate some of that gain is going to be given up today. IOW, the uncertainty that started with the imposition of Trump's tariffs remains a powerful force of downward pressure on them. That will likely be the prevailing sentiment for a while.
Even those come with the caveat that the path forward is not at all clear given the 90d pause in most of Trump's tariffs. Thus, there's as much uncertainty about the impact of tariffs at the rates Trump is talking about going forward as there was before the pause. Chaos within the WH is, apparently, still present.
The administration's shifting depiction of it's trade and tariff policies may be consistent with Trump's overall behavior and characterized as some kind of a "grand strategy" (his people have said that this morning). The downside is that when he says something about trade policy himself or his spokes people do, his history of twisting the facts to his view or flat-out lying have become so regular that anything that is said about US trade policy isn't believable...... and let me be clear: I'm not a "Trumper" or an apologist for his trade policy behavior. I did not vote for him. What I post here that may sound like support for DJT and his trade policy is simply a reflection of my willingness to entertain the arguments for and against both sides of said trade policy. I'm a neutral observer with a lean toward favoring a lot of things Trump has done since his inauguration - the way his trade policy regarding tariffs was implemented is not among those.
Even though I'm glad trump's pause, or retreat if that's what you want to call it, caused the markets to sharply reverse course, futures this morning indicate some of that gain is going to be given up today. IOW, the uncertainty that started with the imposition of Trump's tariffs remains a powerful force of downward pressure on them. That will likely be the prevailing sentiment for a while.
Comment