Originally posted by entropy
View Post
Incredible.
So, I go back to probably JFK v. Nixon in '60. I would have been 12 but my parents, both Rs were into this election. My Mom was an organizer. Still two substantial candidates and at the time substantial issues that were actually talked about and debated by both sides. That JFK was a Catholic was out there but spoken about in hushed tones and regarded by most as inappropriate to discuss as a matter of presidential politics.
Then Came Dukakis v. George H. Bush in '88. I recall a lot of Identity Politics emerging in that campaign with Dukakis, not that he and the issues of the day were substantial at all, being the butt of plenty of jokes about the dweeb he was. It's been like that since then but this ........
This contest takes the absolute cake for awful presidential election seasons with substantive issues on the sidelines, or in the case of Trump being inappropriately characterized, and identity politics at the forefront. IMO, Hillary is not insubstantial. Sh'e smart and experienced but the rest of her baggage, not much of it having to do with carrying out the duties of the office of President but rather HOW she might carry them out are huge distractors to the attractiveness of her candidicy.
Comment