Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by iam416 View Post
Well, theft penalties are measured by value. This being less than $1000, it's likely a first degree misdemeanor in most states. If you were in, oh, I don't know, a Prog utopia like San Francisco people aren't even prosecuted for theft of his nature.
If it amounts to breaking and entering, then it's a felony and PROBABLY 6 months.
Florida Residents Plead Guilty To Conspiracy To Commit Interstate Transportation Of Stolen Property | USAO-SDNY | Department of Justice
- Top
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by iam416 View Post
I honestly don't know.
Yeah I don't really know either. I'm just speculating the diary's value isn't virtually nothing though, even though that's how any ordinary person's diary would be viewed.
- Top
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post
In this case specifically the two actual thieves pled to charges of trafficking stolen property across state lines. And they were paid $40,000 total for it, not 20k like i thought. So under the law is the value of the item close to nothing, because it's just some woman's diary, or is the value $40,000, because it belonged to a "celebrity" and that's what someone was willing to pay for it?
Florida Residents Plead Guilty To Conspiracy To Commit Interstate Transportation Of Stolen Property | USAO-SDNY | Department of Justice
In Ohio, I'm not sure they do it that way. The specify that certain things are felonies that wouldn't necessarily have value -- like a credit card or ID. They do not specify personal effects. So, like I said, I honestly don't know.
In any event, the likelihood of doing actual jail time is modest (IMO). But, I honestly don't particularly care. There's nothing in that diary that will change my mind or that I care to read. I think you're right in that publishing someone's diary is pretty gross and I think Hannibal is right with his "whataboutism" and all of that is mostly just a comment on the grossly partisan world in which we live.Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]?
Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
- Top
Comment
-
I think you're right in that publishing someone's diary is pretty gross
- Top
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hannibal View Post
DSL doesn't legitimately think that publishing somebody's diary is gross. if somebody got ahold of Ivanka Trump's diary and it had embarrassing stuff about her dad in it, he'd be tap dancing.
I can recall that Project Veritas themselves tried to get the Washington Post to pay their undercover people for salacious accusations against Roy Moore and they wouldn't bite. That was the start of PV's decline.
- Top
Comment
-
Who gives a shit if they paid for stolen property? Are they the first organization to ever do that? Is that your feigned moral outrage for the day? I think that the accusations that are in the diary are more worthy of discussion than how that diary came into the public eye.Last edited by Hannibal; March 22, 2023, 08:16 AM.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hannibal View PostWho gives a shit if they paid for stolen property? Are they the first organization to ever do that? Is that your feigned moral outrage for the day? I think that the accusations that are in the diary are more worthy of discussion than how that diary came into the public eye.
Also, no they aren't, you lecherous goon.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post
All criminals, when caught red-handed and with no other defense, shriek that everyone does it.
.
I don't know if "everybody does it". But I know that Daniel Elsberg did it, and he received zero punishment for it. I also know that the Feds didn't raid the homes of WaPo editors and reporters in response.
He says that he wasn't paid and that he is just a good Samaritan. We'll never know, because he was never put into position to have to bargain for his freedom. He was let go for purely political reasons. That he was guilty of releasing top secret information is not in dispute.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hannibal View Post
No, they don't. And what crime, exactly has PV been caught "red handed" doing?
I don't know if "everybody does it". But I know that Daniel Elsberg did it, and he received zero punishment for it. I also know that the Feds didn't raid the homes of WaPo editors and reporters in response.
He says that he wasn't paid and that he is just a good Samaritan. We'll never know, because he was never put into position to have to bargain for his freedom. He was let go for purely political reasons. That he was guilty of releasing top secret information is not in dispute.
I also mentioned that Ellsberg was charged and went on trial. But the Nixon administration unintentionally sabotaged his prosecution because they repeatedly broke the law trying to catch him.
- Top
Comment
Comment