Announcement

Collapse

Please support the Forum by using the Amazon Link this Holiday Season

Amazon has started their Black Friday sales and there are some great deals to be had! As you shop this holiday season, please consider using the forum's Amazon.com link (listed in the menu as "Amazon Link") to add items to your cart and purchase them. The forum gets a small commission from every item sold.

Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.

If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!

Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.

Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah

Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
See more
See less

Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The real question for Trump is why did he take those specific documents? He could probably explain away his kissy face letters to NoKo, but nuclear weapon documents is a whole different animal.

    I suspect Traitor Trump was going to sell a good chunk of them as his real estate loans come due over the next couple of years.
    I don't watch Fox News for the same reason I don't eat out of a toilet.

    Comment


    • That said, search warrants and the like served on a former president are a bit chilling.
      Only to the extent that you have confidence that a former president is and was by nature an honorable man. DJT was not and if he ends up being indicted and convicted it will be exactly what he has wrought upon himself by his inexcusably dishonorable conduct while in office and after that outside of it. Nothing more, nothing less.

      BTW, AA, you'll be overjoyed to know that I learned what honorable men those of Scott's heritage can be from binge-watching the "chick flick," Outlander. I can see Trump as the scallywag Captain Stephen Bonnet but not as James or Murtagh Fraser.
      Mission to CFB's National Championship accomplished. But the shine on the NC Trophy is embarrassingly wearing off. It's M B-Ball ..... or hockey or volley ball or name your college sport favorite time ...... until next year.

      Comment


      • lol@Outlander
        Last edited by AlabamAlum; August 26, 2022, 02:27 PM.
        "The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is sometimes hard to verify their authenticity." -Abraham Lincoln

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Jeff Buchanan View Post

          Only to the extent that you have confidence that a former president is and was by nature an honorable man. DJT was not and if he ends up being indicted and convicted it will be exactly what he has wrought upon himself by his inexcusably dishonorable conduct while in office and after that outside of it. Nothing more, nothing less.

          BTW, AA, you'll be overjoyed to know that I learned what honorable men those of Scott's heritage can be from binge-watching the "chick flick," Outlander. I can see Trump as the scallywag Captain Stephen Bonnet but not as James or Murtagh Fraser.
          Jeff,

          No, nothing about honor, just the use of indictments, subpoenas, search warrants (etc) as political weapons.
          "The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is sometimes hard to verify their authenticity." -Abraham Lincoln

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post

            You know, if you won't even entertain the possibility that Trump did anything wrong or that any of this is his own fault, then maybe stop getting offended when froot or CGVT calls you a Trumper.
            Yes he violated a law. I said charge him. Did you miss that? I also said while you are at it...raid Hillary and Hunter...then file charges there as well.
            Shut the fuck up Donny!

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Hannibal View Post

              No shit -- it's almost as if Liz Cheney doesn't actually have principles.
              Liz has an extreme case of Trump Derangement Syndrome.
              Shut the fuck up Donny!

              Comment


              • We are probably never going to know why he was hoarding those documents or what they were. It seems like raid was probably necessary to get the documents back, but unless they have some sort of evidence he was trying to do something with them, give him a strongly worded rebuke like they did to Hillary Clinton. They have the documents back, no need to charge unless there is some more information.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by AlabamAlum View Post

                  Jeff,

                  No, nothing about honor, just the use of indictments, subpoenas, search warrants (etc) as political weapons.
                  Ok, let's say you're running the Department of Justice. The National Archives informs you that the former President took highly classified information with him when he left the White House, including at least 25 documents marked "top secret". He's essentially keeping them unsecured in banker's boxes scattered around his house/social club, mixed in with mementos and scrapbook material. The Director of the National Archives tells you the former President is very angry that the FBI was told about any of this and he is asserting executive privileges and forbidding the FBI any permission to sort through the materials. Months of legal wrangling occur and Biden is forced to get involved to wave away Trump's privlege claim. The President's lawyers sign sworn statements that there are no more secret documents at his house but when you show up with a subpoena to look, you find many, many more. Then another month later you get a tip from someone on the inside that there's still a lot more stuff that wasn't turned over on your previous search (this last part is speculative but they clearly had reason to believe there was more to be found, they found stuff, and cited obstruction as a charge in the warrant). Perhaps on the security video you have, you've noticed people who have no security clearance are looking through the boxes.

                  If a search warrant is unacceptable under any circumstances, what are your alternative solutions here?

                  EDIT: And I've said today and said it weeks ago, I don't see prosecution here (of Trump) being a good idea unless there was something really really detrimental to national security in those documents.

                  Comment


                  • Also I've criticized the government in the past for over-classifying stuff. A lot of what Wikileaks dumped to the world was silly frivolous stuff that had no business being considered a state secret. So I don't know. Something marked "HCS" could be totally unimportant because the govt has a habit of being overly secretive. But then, I don't know why Trump would take boring, uninteresting stuff with him.

                    Comment


                    • 301828742_5637745569578568_5290228213199647888_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_p526x296&_nc_cat=103&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=tUP2qpjHW2QAX_7_mpS&_nc_ht=scontent-ort2-1.xx&oh=00_AT_JAt2cuCxLY7C0LVzKfuT9xu8EpeJbGpgfmRK_4vFmFg&oe=630E783D

                      "The stockings were hung by the chimney with care, .. I'd worn them for weeks, and they needed the air"

                      Comment


                      • It checks out

                        Comment


                        • heh

                          Funny because it's probably not far from actuality...
                          Shut the fuck up Donny!

                          Comment


                          • It IS funny but also a bit ironic, because that's the quality of legal documents his lawyers file.

                            Comment


                            • STFU
                              Shut the fuck up Donny!

                              Comment


                              • Wiz-

                                Singin' and jinglin' the jango
                                Floatin' like the heavens above
                                It looks like muskrat love

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X