Gun control advocacy typically has not been a winning play for campaigns.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Mike View PostGun control advocacy typically has not been a winning play for campaigns.
There is a whole genre about people solving their problems without guns....they’re called courtroom dramas. They typically get outperformed exponentially by action flicks. They do tend to do well on TV.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by hack View PostBut the rest of the world watches Hollywood too, and there are films and plenty of media from other places that glorify violence.
India put in gun control laws in 1959, Japan post WWII (though they had some restrictions on certain groups years earlier), Malaysia 1960, many European countries restricted gun ownership to hunting after the wars... I'd argue Hollywood in 1950 is very different than today in their reach and scope. Even today, TV shows in the US have limited viewership globally.
the US was founded on guns, expanded on guns (how the west was won), profited on guns, and glorified guns to levels nobody else has in the last 100-150 yrs. And I still would suggest nobody glorifies guns as a culture more, as we can see in TV and Movies.Grammar... The difference between feeling your nuts and feeling you're nuts.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wild Hoss View PostIts not a real big seller for Hollywood either.
There is a whole genre about people solving their problems without guns....they’re called courtroom dramas. They typically get outperformed exponentially by action flicks. They do tend to do well on TV.
name the courtroom dramas that dominated the airways in the 50's, 60's, 70's, 80's, 90's.. For every Perry Mason, how many cowboy or cop shoes did Hollywood produce for generations?
I realize that you love movies and what I say scares you.. however, you just can't ban all guns. You have to change the culture.Last edited by entropy; June 23, 2016, 10:36 AM.Grammar... The difference between feeling your nuts and feeling you're nuts.
- Top
Comment
-
Hoss said:Just a guess, but I bet the Fibbies don't want to send a notice to suspicious persons they may want to investigate, clearly alerting them that the FBI is onto him/her. If they try to board a plane the jig will be up, but until then they should be in the dark.
- Top
Comment
-
I think what's a very strong argument is that they've been legal enough that the cat's out of the bag and cannot be put back in. That is the one element of this that makes the US seem unique to me.
- Top
Comment
-
While I do think we could/should have more restrictions on guns and I'd actually like to see all hand guns go to revolvers (tougher reload)... But I also believe there are people wanting to do more and I'm not sure it can change (the cat out of the bag thought or as I put it, cultural issues). I also have friends who carry guns in the purses due to fear/safety/past events. I really would not want them to feel unprotected.Grammar... The difference between feeling your nuts and feeling you're nuts.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by entropy View Postname the courtroom dramas that dominated the airways in the 50's, 60's, 70's, 80's, 90's.. For every Perry Mason, how many cowboy or cop shoes did Hollywood produce for generations?
I realize that you love movies and what I say scares you.. however, you just can't ban all guns. You have to change the culture.
No mention of banning all guns.
No comparison between TV courtroom dramas and cop/cowboy shows.
Agree with changing the culture....you are mistaken in falling back on the old saw of the Hollywood Boogieman however. It a reflection of who we are, not a cause. That was my point.
- Top
Comment
Comment