Originally posted by Ghengis Jon
View Post
First, there seems to be a lot of confusion on "lists" - how you get on one, how you get off and what things you can't do being on one.
Fienstein was right in proposing the legislation that would have strengthened the utility of Terrorist Watch Lists.
Clearly these are sticky issues but it seems to me where at a place where reasonable measures to (1) identify individuals who have the potential of carrying out a terrorist attack and (2) put them on a list where the purchase of a firearm is going to get scrutinized by putting all the available data together to make a decision .... . there seems to be nothing wrong with a waiting period when there is a question.
Based on what I know about the Committee on Un-American Activities, I would be opposed to any panel that would act as this one did. That does not mean I don't support closing gun purchase loop holes or taking steps to give Terrorist Watch Lists more utility.
Comment