Travis McMichael will go under cross-examination by the prosecutor today over in the Arbery trial. The judge is also supposed to rule if Prosecutors can mention that the guy who filmed it (and co-defendent) testified that McMichael called Arbery the n word while he lay dying.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects
Collapse
X
-
The purpose of the Rittenhouse trial is to send a message. You are at the mercy of the mob.
Judge Schroeder also addressed the media regarding false reporting, etc. He explained why Rittenhouse was allowed to draw out the alternate jurors from the raffle barrel. You see, back in the 1980s he presided over a murder trial with a black defendant. There were 13 people on the jury and one of them would be randomly selected as an alternate. He had the court clerk draw the number and it happened to be the only black juror on the panel. Complaints about it being fixed were made. After that, he adopted his current system where the accused draws out the numbers so nobody can make that claim anymore. You could say he based his decision on logic and reason; the new racism in 2021.
- Top
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View PostTravis McMichael will go under cross-examination by the prosecutor today over in the Arbery trial. The judge is also supposed to rule if Prosecutors can mention that the guy who filmed it (and co-defendent) testified that McMichael called Arbery the n word while he lay dying.
https://www.firstcoastnews.com/artic...1-fc874e104e29
- Top
Comment
-
If I were the judge I'd be inclined to exclude that testimony. It is, at best, suggestive of the defendants' state of mind. It is, however, highly prejudicial. In other words, it's a tailor-made issue for appeal. IMO, they'll get convicted with or without the testimony, so I'd lean toward excluding it and taking away a viable appeals issue.Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]?
Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
- Top
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by iam416 View PostIf I were the judge I'd be inclined to exclude that testimony. It is, at best, suggestive of the defendants' state of mind. It is, however, highly prejudicial. In other words, it's a tailor-made issue for appeal. IMO, they'll get convicted with or without the testimony, so I'd lean toward excluding it and taking away a viable appeals issue.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post
This seems fair. I think the judge previously excluded any mention of McMichael's facebook posts where he used racial slurs. He had a Confederate flag license plate on his truck and I think the Defense wanted it blurred out from the video and any photos but the Judge wouldn't go that far.
https://news.yahoo.com/judge-deems-t...174108439.html
This is a closer question than the FB stuff because there's actually some probative value given its contemporaneous nature. But, again, I'd tend to exclude.Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]?
Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hannibal View Post
They might do that, but then they will end up in prison. The purpose of the Rittenhouse trial is to send a message. You are at the mercy of the mob."in order to lead America you must love America"
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by lineygoblue View Post
Well, that may be true in Kenosha, but here we had judges and prosecutors who refused to carry out the edicts of our idiotic governor and AG. They're a bit more people friendly here. That business burning stuff won't fly out here.
- Top
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hannibal View Post
As best I can tell, Kenosha isn't commie central. Trump won the county by 3 points. The city itself is probably bluer than that, but the point that I am trying to make is that there are very few locales where you are safe from the wrath of BLM and Antifa. In most places, there is a prosecutor available to make an example of you.
- Top
- Likes 4
Comment
Comment